Last Updated: May 4th, 2016

  1. Abbs, F., & Collier-Wilson, R. (2015). How is our Discovery System Perceived by Users? In IGeLU 2015 Conference Budapest. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/11.22How-is-our-Discovery-System-Perceived-by-Users_RCW_FA.pps
  2. Ajamie, L. (2015). Discovering User Behavior in your Discovery System: Custom Google Analytics Event Tracking. In IGeLU 2015 Conference Budapest. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Ajamie-discovering-user-behavior-in-your-discovery-system.pptx
  3. Aharony, N., & Prebor, G. (2015). Librarians’ and Information Professionals’ Perspectives Towards Discovery Tools — An Exploratory Study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.05.003
  4. Allen, N. D. (2015). Utilizing Discovery Tools for Classrooms: How Do Librarian Attitudes on Discovery Impact Tools They Teach? Library Hi Tech News, 32(1), 8–12. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-09-2014-0078
  5. Aswathy, S. (2015). Webscale Discovery Tools: A Solution for Inestimable Online Resources. In S. Thanuskodi (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Inventive Digital Tools for Collection Management and Development in Modern Libraries (pp. 69–85). IGI Global. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8178-1.ch005
  6. Ávila-García, L., Ortiz-Repiso, V., & Rodríguez-Mateos, D. (2015). Herramientas de descubrimiento: ¿una ventanilla única? Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 38(1), 1–17. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/redc.2015.1.1178
  7. Azadbakht, E. S., & Polacek, K. M. (2015). Information Literacy Instruction with Primo. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 54(3), 23–26. Retrieved from http://journals.ala.org/rusq/article/view/5638
  8. Badke, W. (2015). Whatever Happened to Browse. Online Searcher, 39(2), 71–73.
  9. Bakkalbasi, N., & Goertzen, M. (2015). Exploring academic e-book use: part I through text analysis. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 16(3), 252–262. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/PMM-10-2015-0035
  10. Baron, C. (2015). Lessons learned – Aufbau eines zentralen Discovery Services. In 104. Deutscher Bibliothekartag in Nürnberg 2015. Nürnberg. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:0290-opus4-17800
  11. Bartlakowski, K. (2015). Make the library really look more like google. Bibliotheksdienst, 49(6), 643–648. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bd-2015-0073
  12. Birkner, M. (2015). VuFind an der AK Bibliothek Wien. Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen & Bibliothekare, 68(1), 79–90. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10760/25124
  13. Blandford, L. (2015). Introducing LibrarySearch at the University of Kent. Refer: Journal of the ISG, 31(1). Retrieved from https://referisg.wordpress.com/2015/03/01/introducing-librarysearch-at-the-university-of-kent/
  14. Borchert, T., & Fischer, E. (2015). Is Your Discovery Tool REALLY Better than Google? In 2015 Library Technology Conference, Macalester College, St. Paul – March 18-19. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/libtech_conf/2015/sessions/36
  15. Botzer, M. (2015). Delivering the experience that users expect: Core principles for designing library discovery services. Retrieved from http://meetexlibris.com/designing-library-discovery-services/
  16. Branch, D. (2015). Successful E-Resource Acquisitions: Looking Beyond Selecting, Ordering, Paying, and Receiving to Discovery and Access. In 2014 Charleston Library Conference. Purdue University. Purdue e-Pubs. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/charleston/2014/Collection/8/
  17. Breeding, M. (2015). The Future of Library Resource Discovery: A white paper commissioned by the NISO Discovery to Delivery (D2D) Topic Committee (pp. 1–49). Baltimore, MD: NISO. Retrieved from http://www.niso.org/apps/group_public/download.php/14487/future_library_resource_discovery.pdf
  18. Breeding, M. (2015). Library Systems Report 2015. American Libraries, 46(5), 28–41.
  19. Breeding, M. (2015). Relationship with Discovery. Library Technology Reports, 51(4), 22–25. Retrieved from https://journals.ala.org/ltr/article/view/5688/7067
  20. Breeding, M. (2015). Working out the Future of Library Resource Discovery. In NISO Forum: The Future of Library Resource Discovery. Baltimore, Maryland. Retrieved from http://fr.slideshare.net/BaltimoreNISO/2015-niso-forum-the-future-of-library-resource-discovery-53559730
  21. Breeding, M., & Brooks, S. (2015). A Discussion on Discovery. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wG6H_xV85kM
  22. Browning, S. (2015). The Discovery–Collection Librarian Connection: Cultivating Collaboration for Better Discovery. Collection Management, 40(4), 197–206. http://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2015.1093985
  23. Bryant, S., & Ye, G. (2015). From Discovery to Delivery: Successful Systems Integration. Technical Services Quarterly, 32(4), 383–389. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2015.1059678
  24. Bulock, C., Hosburgh, N., & Mann, S. (2015). OA in the Library Collection: The Challenges of Identifying and Maintaining Open Access Resources. The Serials Librarian, 68(1-4), 79–86. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2015.1023690
  25. Calarco, P., Conrad, L., Kessler, R., & Vandenburg, M. (2015). Metadata Challenges in Library Discovery Systems. In 2014 Charleston Library Conference. Purdue University. Purdue e-Pubs. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/charleston/2014/Tech/3/
  26. Calvert, K. (2015). Maximizing academic library collections: measuring changes in use patterns owing to EBSCO Discovery Service. College & Research Libraries, 76(1), 81–99. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/crl.76.1.81
  27. Carpenter, T., Heterick, B., & Bernier, S. (2015). Driving Discovery: Do You Have the Keys to Fair Linking? (It’s About Knowledge and Library Control). In 2014 Charleston Library Conference. Purdue University. Purdue e-Pubs. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/charleston/2014/Plenaries/15/
  28. Celik, M. (2015). Real-time analytics/metrics dashboard in Primo. In IGeLU 2015 Conference Budapest. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/10.22__primo_analytics__mehmet_celik.pdf
  29. Chatterjee, P., & Das, D. (2015). Web Scale Discovery Service And Tools With Special Reference To Central Library, IIT Kharagpur. International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, 2(3), 677–686. Retrieved from http://ijiset.com/vol2/v2s3/IJISET_V2_I3_109.pdf
  30. Chumbe, S., MacLeod, R., & Kelly, B. (2015). We Should Not Light an Open Access Lamp and then Hide it Under a Bushel! In B. Schmidt & M. Dobreva (Eds.), New Avenues for Electronic Publishing in the Age of Infinite Collections and Citizen Science: Scale, Openness and Trust (pp. 102–112). IOS Press. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-562-3-102
  31. Ciccone, K., & Vickery, J. (2015). Summon, EBSCO Discovery Service, and Google Scholar: A Comparison of Search Performance Using User Queries. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 10(1), 34–49. Retrieved from https://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/23845
  32. Colson, J., & Allen, K. (2015). Our Trek to Discovery: A Tale of Implementation. Online Searcher, 39(2), 45–49. Retrieved from http://www.infotoday.com/OnlineSearcher/Articles/Features/Our-Trek-to-Discovery-A-Tale-of-Implementation-102366.shtml
  33. Chumbe, S., Kelly, B., & MacLeod, R. (2015). Hybrid Journals: Ensuring Systematic and Standard Discoverability of the Latest Open Access Articles. The Serials Librarian, 68(1-4), 143–155. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2015.1016856
  34. Cohen, R. A., & Thorpe, A. (2015). Discovering User Behavior: Applying Usage Statistics to Shape Frontline Services. The Serials Librarian, 69(1), 29–46. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2015.1040194
  35. Craft, E. (2015). Library Maps?: Extending Primo functionality through lightboxes. In IGeLU 2015 Conference Budapest. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/5.31_EdwardCraft.pptx
  36. Dalal, H. A., Kimura, A. K., & Hofmann, M. A. (2015). Searching in the Wild: Observing Information-Seeking Behavior in a Discovery Tool. In ACRL 2015 Proceedings – March 25–28, 2015, Portland, Oregon (pp. 668–675). Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/confsandpreconfs/2015/Dalal_Kimura_Hofmann.pdf
  37. Decoster, S. (2015). Relever le défi des outils “discovery”? : les formations orientées vers l’usager. Former aux compétences informationnelles à l’heure du web 2.0 et des discovery tools. Gembloux. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2268/182048
  38. Deodato, J. (2015). Evaluating Web-Scale Discovery Services: A Step-by-Step Guide. Information Technology and Libraries, 34(2), 19–75. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v34i2.5745
  39. Dulle, F. W. (2015). Online Information Resources Availability and Accessibility: A Developing Countries’ Scenario. African Journal of Library, Archives & Information Science, 25(1), 45–57.
  40. Durante, K., & Hardy, D. (2015). Discovery, Management, and Preservation of Geospatial Data Using Hydra. Journal of Map & Geography Libraries, 11(2), 123–154. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15420353.2015.1041630
  41. Edwards, H. (2015). How Useful are Library Discovery Tools? Refer: Journal of the ISG, 31(1), 8–11. Retrieved from https://referisg.wordpress.com/2015/03/01/how-useful-are-library-discovery-tools/
  42. Elizabeth Namei, & Young, C. A. (2015). Measuring Our Relevancy: Comparing Results in a Web-Scale Discovery Tool, Google & Google Scholar. In ACRL 2015 Proceedings – March 25–28, 2015, Portland, Oregon (pp. 522–535). Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/confsandpreconfs/2015/Namei_Young.pdf
  43. Franke, F., Groß, M., & Wawra, S. (2015). Der Discovery Service Primo im Bibliotheksverbund Bayern. Bibliotheksforum BSB, 9(4), 306–309. Retrieved from https://www.bibliotheksforum-bayern.de/fileadmin/archiv/2015-4/PDF-Einzelbeitraege/BFB_0415_16_Franke_V03.pdf
  44. Frederiksen, L. (2015). Exploring Discovery. Public Services Quarterly, 11(1), 43–47. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2014.995861
  45. Freeman, D., Breeding, M., Heller, M., Silton, K., & Varnum, K. (2015). Web Scale Discovery Services [Video broadcast]. American Libraries Live. Retrieved from http://americanlibrarieslive.org/blog/archive-web-scale-discovery-services
  46. Fu, P. (2015). Migration to Alma/Primo: A Case Study of Central Washington University. Chinese Librarianship, (40), 1–14. Retrieved from http://www.iclc.us/cliej/cl40FC.pdf
  47. Gaines, D. J., & Fagan, J. C. (2015). OAIster on EBSCO Discovery Service, FirstSearch, and OAIster.worldcat.org. The Charleston Advisor, 16(4), 5–12. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5260/chara.16.4.5
  48. Gavali, R. (2015). Discovery Service for Engineering and Technology Literature through Google Custom Search: A Case Study. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 35(6), 417–421. Retrieved from http://publications.drdo.gov.in/ojs/index.php/djlit/article/view/8825
  49. Hanrath, S., & Kottmana, M. (2015). Use and Usability of a Discovery Tool in an Academic Library. Journal of Web Librarianship, 9(1), 1-21. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2014.983259
  50. Hawkins, D. T. (2015). The Next Generation of Discovery Services: Where Are They Headed? — An NFAIS Workshop. Against the Grain, 27(1), 81–84. Retrieved from http://www.against-the-grain.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/dons_notes_v27-1.pdf
  51. Helling, W. (2015). Are You Experienced? Exploring User Experience in Public Libraries Discovery Systems… to the Rescue? Going Beyond your ILS-Based OPAC. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/WilliamHelling/3-discoverysystems-46642504
  52. Henry, R. L. (2015). Moving from Theory to Practice: Incorporating Feminist Approaches into Search and Discovery Tool Development. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(4), 514–516. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.06.020
  53. Herbertsson, L.-H., Widigson, M., Johansson, R., & Kovanen, L. (2015). Recycling Database Records. In 2014 Charleston Library Conference. Purdue University. Purdue e-Pubs. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/charleston/2014/Tech/6/
  54. Hienert, D., Sawitzki, F., & Mayr, P. (2015). Digital Library Research in Action: Supporting Information Retrieval in Sowiport. D-Lib Magazine, 21(3/4). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1045/march2015-hienert
  55. Hofmann, A., & Wiermann, B. (2015). The VuFind Based “MT-Katalog”: A Customized Music Library Service at the University of Music and Drama Leipzig. In B. Lausen, S. Krolak-Schwerdt, & M. Böhmer (Eds.), Data Science, Learning by Latent Structures, and Knowledge Discovery (pp. 547–556). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44983-7_48
  56. Hubbard, J. (2015). Search@UW (Primo-Alma) Usability Testing Materials. UWM Libraries Other Staff Publications. Retrieved from http://dc.uwm.edu/lib_staffart/5
  57. Grant, C. (2015). Another perspective on ProQuest buying the Ex Libris Group. Thoughts from Carl Grant. Retrieved from http://thoughts.care-affiliates.com/2015/10/another-perspective-on-proquest-buying.html
  58. Grindley, N. (2015). From where we are to where we want to be: The future of resource discovery from a UK perspective. In NISO Forum: The Future of Library Resource Discovery. Baltimore, Maryland. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/BaltimoreNISO/2015-niso-forum-the-future-of-library-resource-discovery-53603186
  59. Jing, J., Lin, Q., Sharifi, A., & Swartz, M. (2015). Making User Rights Clear: Adding e-resource License Information in Library Systems. Code4Lib Journal, (29). Retrieved from http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/10724
  60. Kain, M. M. (2015). Discovery, a New Way of Searching (Thinking): The Challenges, Trials, and Tribulations. In 2014 Charleston Library Conference. Purdue University. Purdue e-Pubs. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/charleston/2014/Users/7/
  61. Kohila, G. T., & Elavazhagan, K. (2015). Empowering libraries with discovery tools. Indian Journal of Science, 21(72), 195–200. Retrieved from http://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:ijs2&volume=21&issue=72&article=005
  62. Koot, G.-J. (2015). The Art Discovery Group Catalogue: a new and freely-available tool for art historical bibliographic research. Art Libraries Journal, 40(3), 41–48.
  63. Kronenfeld, M. R., & Bright, H. S. (2015). Library resource discovery. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 103(4), 210–213. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.4.011
  64. Larose, K., & Preater, A. (2015). UX at Imperial: a case study of qualitative approaches to Primo usability studies. In IGeLU 2015 Conference Budapest. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/5.02-UX-at-Imperial.pptx
  65. Levine-Clark, M., & Price, J. S. (2015). Where Do We Go From Here? Assessing the Value and Impact of Discovery Systems. In NISO Forum: The Future of Library Resource Discovery. Baltimore, Maryland. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/BaltimoreNISO/2015-niso-forum-the-future-of-library-resource-discovery-53562956
  66. Li, H., & Cruickshank, D. (2015). Digital Libraries: Providing Quality Information. In R. B. Allen, J. Hunter, & M. L. Zeng (Eds.), Digital Libraries: Providing Quality Information: 17th International Conference on Asia-Pacific Digital Libraries, ICADL 2015, Seoul, Korea, December 9-12, 2015. Proceedings (Vol. 9469, pp. 153–157). Springer International Publishing. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27974-9_15
  67. Library users reject new online catalog – old one returning. (2015). Los Altos Town Crier. Los Altos. Retrieved from http://www.losaltosonline.com/news/sections/news/199-city-affairs/50850-library-users-reject-new-online-catalog-old-one-returning
  68. Lukesch, R. (2015). Das Discovery System Primo im OBV – Integration und Kooperation. In 32. Österreichischer Bibliothekartag in Wien 2015. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:0290-opus4-21636
  69. Lundrigan, C., Manuel, K., & Yan, M. (2015). “Pretty Rad”: Explorations in User Satisfaction with a Discovery Layer at Ryerson University. College & Research Libraries, 76(1), 43-62. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/crl.76.1.43
  70. Madsen, C., & Hurst, M. (2015). Resource Discovery @ The University of Oxford. Retrieved from http://www.athenaeum21.com/#!Resource-Discovery-The-University-of-Oxford/gi8ew/566f19d40cf274f69811e877
  71. Magnan, D., Duffy, C., & Mackes, R. T. (2015). Implementing a Discovery Tool in a Hospital Library: A Tale of Two Success Stories. Journal of Hospital Librarianship, 15(4), 435–443. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15323269.2015.1079767
  72. McManamon, C. (2015). Learning from observation: end user reaction to the Summon discovery service. Insights: The UKSG Journal, 28(1), 64–68. Retrieved from http://insights.uksg.org/article/download/uksg.176/417
  73. Mitchell, E., West, B., & Johns-Masten, K. (2015). Revitalizing Library Services with Usability Data: Testing 1, 2, 3… Computers in Libraries, 35(4), 11–14. Retrieved from http://www.infotoday.com/cilmag/may15/Mitchell-West-Johns-Masten–Revitalizing-Library-Services-With-Usability-Data.shtml
  74. Morse, L., Conrad, L., Gilstrap, D., Chen, B., Kessler, R., Gindi, M. (Michelle), & D’Agnostino, A. (2015). NISO Working Group Connections LIVE! Collaborative Improvements: ODI Success Stories (January 28, 2015). Retrieved from http://fr.slideshare.net/BaltimoreNISO/open-discovery-initiative-successes-january-28-2015
  75. Moulaison, H. L., Kroeger, A., & Corrado, E. M. (2015). What’s Driving Discovery Systems? The Case for Standards. In IFLA WLIC 2015 Cape Town (pp. 1–9). Cape Town, South Africa: IFLA. Retrieved from http://library.ifla.org/1300/1/166-moulaison-en.pdf
  76. Munn, A. (2015). Moving the library systems at the University of Westminster to a hosted service. SCONUL Focus, (63), 2–5. Retrieved from http://www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/2 Munn.pdf
  77. Narayanan, N. (2015). Implementing Web Scale Discovery Services: special reference to Indian Libraries’ context. In G. Devarajan, K. C. Abdul Majeed, D. Koovakkai, P. K. S. Kumar, & S. Beena (Eds.), Blended Libraries and Information Centres: A Blueprint for the Development of Information Profession in India. Southern Bookstar. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2411.8245
  78. Nelson, D., & Turney, L. (2015). What’s in a word??: Rethinking facet headings in a discovery service. Information Technology and Libraries, 34(2), 76–91. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v34i2.5629
  79. North, M. (2015). Deep Searching, Interoperability, and more Digital Collections. In IGeLU 2015 Conference Budapest. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/11.03-North.pptx
  80. Owen, W., & Michalak, S. C. (2015). Engine Of Innovation: Building the High Performance Catalog. Information Technology and Libraries, 34(2), 5–18. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v34i2.5702
  81. Petr, J., & Currie, L. (2015). How Do Librarians Prefer to Access Collections? In 2014 Charleston Library Conference. Purdue University. Purdue e-Pubs. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/charleston/2014/Users/10/
  82. Polidoro, P. (2015). Using Qualitative Methods to Analyze Online Catalog Interfaces. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 53(3-4), 314–330. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2015.1013235
  83. Prommann, M., & Zhang, T. (2015). Applying Hierarchical Task Analysis Method to Discovery Layer Evaluation. Information Technology & Libraries, 34(1), 77–105. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v34i1.5600
  84. Raieli, R. (2015). Vecchi paradigmi e nuove interfacce: la ricerca di un equilibrato sviluppo degli strumenti di mediazione dell’informazione (Prima parte). AIB studi, 55(1). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2426/aibstudi-11084
  85. Raieli, R. (2015). Vecchi paradigmi e nuove interfacce: la ricerca di un equilibrato sviluppo degli strumenti di mediazione dell’informazione (Seconda parte). AIB studi, 55(2). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2426/aibstudi-11200
  86. Renaville, F. (2015). D’un Primo en local à un Primo dans le cloud : deux déploiements en deux ans d’une solution discovery à l’Université de Liège. In ANF Documentation Mathématique 2015 : Les bibliothèques mathématiques de demain. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2268/188168
  87. Rodríguez Bravo, B. (2015). Information Searching Using Discovery Tools and OPACs. Strengths and Weaknesses. In 2015 IFLA Annual Meeting/World Library Information Congress. Cape Town, South Africa: IFLA. Retrieved from http://library.ifla.org/1154/2/141-rodriquez-en.pdf
  88. Sadeh, T. (2015). From Search to Discovery. Bibliothek Forschung Und Praxis, 39(2), 212–224. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bfp-2015-0028
  89. Sadler, B., & Bourg, C. (2015). Feminism and the Future of Library Discovery. Code4Lib Journal, (28). Retrieved from http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/10425
  90. Schonfeld, R. C. (2015). What Are the Larger Implications of ProQuest’s Acquisition of Ex Libris? Libraries & Scholarly Communication. Retrieved from http://www.sr.ithaka.org/blog/what-are-the-larger-implications-of-proquests-acquisition-of-exlibris/
  91. Seeber, K. P. (2015). Teaching “format as a process” in an era of Web-scale discovery. Reference Services Review, 43(1), 19–30. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/RSR-07-2014-0023
  92. Seeliger, F. (2015). A Tool for Systematic Visualization of Controlled Descriptors and Their Relation to Others as a Rich Context for a Discovery System. In IFLA WLIC 2015 Cape Town (p. 4). Retrieved from http://library.ifla.org/1227/1/141-seeliger-en.pdf
  93. Shen-Aridor, S. (2015). Challenges of Discovery Tools. In IGeLU 2015 Conference Budapest. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/10.21Challenges-of-Discovery-Tools.ppsx
  94. Shi, X., & Levy, S. (2015). An Empirical Review of Library Discovery Tools. Journal of Service Science and Management, 8, 716–7125. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2015.85073
  95. Spezi, V., Creaser, C., & Conyers, A. (2015). The impact of RDS on usage of electronic content in UK academic libraries: selected results from a UKSG-funded project. Serials Review. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2015.1035991
  96. Stohn, C. (2015). How Do Users Search and Discover? – Findings from Ex Libris User Research. Retrieved from http://www.exlibrisgroup.com/category/UserStudiesWhitePaper
  97. Stone, G. (2015). The benefits of resource discovery for publishers: a librarian’s view. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 106–113. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/20150204
  98. Stuart, K., Varnum, K., & Ahronheim, J. (2015). Measuring Journal Linking Success from a Discovery Service. Information Technology & Libraries, 34(1), 52–76. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v34i1.5607
  99. Walker, J. (2015). The NISO Open Discovery Initiative: promoting transparency in discovery. Insights: The UKSG Journal, 28(1), 85–90. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1629/uksg.186
  100. Tang, C. (2015). Achieving the Ables: Reimagining the Digital Discovery Services at the National Library of Singapore. In IFLA WLIC 2015 Cape Town (p. 15). Cape Town, South Africa. Retrieved from http://library.ifla.org/1156/1/147-tang-en.pdf
  101. Tay, A. (2015). 5 things Google Scholar does better than your library discovery service. Musings about librarianship. Retrieved from http://musingsaboutlibrarianship.blogspot.be/2015/07/5-things-google-scholar-does-better.html
  102. Tay, A. (2015). Measuring the value of contributed metadata in web scale discovery services. Retrieved from http://musingsaboutlibrarianship.blogspot.be/2015/12/measuring-value-of-contributed-metadata.html
  103. Tay, A. (2015). Of full text , thick metadata, and discovery search. Musings about librarianship. Retrieved from http://musingsaboutlibrarianship.blogspot.be/2015/10/of-full-text-thick-metadata-full-text.html
  104. Tay, A., & Yikang, F. (2015). Implementing a Bento-Style Search in LibGuides v2. Code4Lib Journal, (29). Retrieved from http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/10709
  105. Van Kampen-Breit, D. J., Asher, D., Henry, E., & Short, B. (2015). Using a shared leadership model to transition to a new ILS & discovery service: A case study. Library Leadership and Management, 30(2). Retrieved from https://journals.tdl.org/llm/index.php/llm/article/view/7145
  106. Wakimoto, D. K. (2015). Undergraduates Have Difficulty Distinguishing Formats Based on Discovery Tool Search Results. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 10(2), 153–155. Retrieved from https://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/23930/18403
  107. Walsh, G. (2015). Discovery at The National Archives. Refer: Journal of the ISG, 31(1), 26–29. Retrieved from https://referisg.wordpress.com/2015/03/01/discovery-at-the-national-archives/
  108. Weber, A. (2015). Einführung in die Welt der Discovery-Services. In 4. Schleswig-Holsteinischer Bibliothekartag, 14. Oktober 2015 in Kiel. Kiel. Retrieved from http://macau.uni-kiel.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/macau_derivate_00000265/VortragWeberSHBibtag2015.pdf
  109. Wilders, C. (2015). Thinking the Unthinkable: A Library Without a Public Catalog. In 2014 Charleston Library Conference. Purdue University. Purdue e-Pubs. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/charleston/2014/Users/6/
  110. Williams, B. A. (2015). Face2Face=Traction. Refer: Journal of the ISG, 31(1), 12–14. Retrieved from https://referisg.wordpress.com/2015/03/01/face2face-traction/
  111. Zhu, J., & Kelley, J. (2015). Collaborating to Reduce Content Gaps in Discovery: What Publishers, Discovery Service Providers, and Libraries Can Do to Close the Gaps. Science & Technology Libraries, 1–14. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2015.1102677