Last Updated: August 2, 2014

  1. Babitchev, V., Hamedinger, W., & Putz, M. (2009). Primo – ein Konsortialmodell für den Österreichischen Bibliothekenverbund (und darüber hinaus). In 30. Österreichischen Bibliothekartag Graz, 16. September 2009. Retrieved from http://www.obvsg.at/fileadmin/files/obvsg/publ/bibtag09_primo_konsortialmodell.pdf
  2. Blenkle, M., Ellis, R., & Haake, E. (2009). Next-generation library catalogues: review of E-LIB. Serials: The Journal for the Serials Community, 22(2), 178–181. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1629/22178
  3. Breeding, M. (2009). Open Discovery Interfaces. American Libraries, 40(6/7), 40–40. Retrieved from http://www.americanlibrariesmagazine.org/article/open-discovery-interfaces
  4. Calhoun, K., Cantrell, J., Gallagher, P., & Hawk, J. (2009). Online Catalogs: What Users and Librarians Want. Dublin, OH: OCLC Online Computer Library Center. Retrieved from http://oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/reports/onlinecatalogs/fullreport.pdf
  5. Carter, J. (2009). Editorial Board Thoughts: Issue Introduction. Discovery: What Do You Mean by That? Information Technology and Libraries, 28(4), 161–163. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v28i4.3226
  6. Chan, P. W., Johnson, D., & Ngian, L. C. (2009). Search Less Find More: Redefining Search Environments to Accommodate New User Behaviors. Singapore Journal of Library & Information Management, 38, 1–12. Retrieved from http://www.las.org.sg/sjlim/SJLIM20091NgianSearch.pdf
  7. Cornish, A. (2009). The New Summit: Building the Foundation for Enhanced User Services. OLA Quarterly, 15(1), 20–23. Retrieved from http://www.olaweb.org/assets/documents/olaq_15no1.pdf
  8. Dahl, M. (2009). The Evolution of Library Discovery Systems in the Web Environment. OLA Quarterly, 15(1), 5–9. Retrieved from http://www.olaweb.org/assets/documents/olaq_15no1.pdf
  9. Dartmouth College Library. (2009). An evaluation of Serials Solutions Summon: as a discovery service for the Dartmouth College Library (p. 29). Dartmouth. Retrieved from http://www.dartmouth.edu/~library/admin/docs/Summon_Report.pdf
  10. Denholm, C., Kauler, L., Lavelle, J., & Sokvitne, L. (2009). Making the new OPAC seamless: dealing with the transition from “finding” to “getting.” Library Hi Tech, 27(1), 13–29. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07378830910942883
  11. Diedrichs, C. P. (2009). Discovery and Delivery: Making it Work for Users. The Serials Librarian, 56(1-4), 79–93. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03615260802679127
  12. Emanuel, J. (2009). Next Generation Catalogs: What Do They Do and Why Should We Care? Reference & User Services Quarterly, 49(2), 117–120. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/rusq.49n2.117
  13. Fabbi, J. L. (2009). “Discovery” Focus as Impetus for Organizational Learning. Information Technology and Libraries, 28(4), 164–171. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v28i4.3227
  14. Griffis, P., & Ford, C. (2009). Enhancing OPAC Records for Discovery. Information Technology and Libraries, 28(4), 191-193. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v28i4.3233
  15. Hadro, J. (2009). Serials solutions Debuts summon. Library Journal, 134(2), 23.
  16. Hänger, C., Sabisch, A., & Lohrum, S. (2009). Consortial Primo Installation at KOBV, Germany. In IGeLU 2009 Conference Helsinki. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/consortial-primo-at-kobv.pdf
  17. Hanson, C., Hessel, H., Barneson, J., Boudewyns, D., Fransen, J., Friedman-Shedlov, L., … Traill, S. (2009). Discoverability Phase 1 Final Report (p. 160). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11299/48258
  18. Ho, B., Kelley, K., & Garrison, S. (2009). Implementing VuFind as an alternative to Voyager’s WebVoyage interface: One library’s experience. Library Hi Tech, 27(1), 82–92. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07378830910942946
  19. Houser, J. (2009). The VuFind implementation at Villanova University. Library Hi Tech, 27(1), 93–105. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07378830910942955
  20. Ipri, T., Yunkin, M., & Brown, J. M. (2009). Usability as a Method for Assessing Discovery. Information Technology & Libraries, 28(4), 181–183. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v28i4.3229
  21. James, D., Garrett, M., & Krevit, L. (2009). Discovering discovery tools: Evaluating vendors and implementing Web 2.0 environments. Library Hi Tech, 27(2), 268-276. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07378830910968218
  22. Johnson, G. (2009). Anywhere, anytime, any device: Primo for a Consortium. In IGeLU 2009 Conference Helsinki. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/primo-for-consortium.pdf
  23. Larsen, T. (2009). The Library Catalog as Experimental Sandbox. OLA Quarterly, 15(1), 10–12. Retrieved from http://www.olaweb.org/assets/documents/olaq_15no1.pdf
  24. Masters, R. (2009). Using Primo for searching Archives and Manuscripts: challenges and an approach. In IGeLU 2009 Conference Helsinki. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/primo-searching-archives-and-manuscripts.pdf
  25. Medeiros, N. (2009). Researching the research process: Information-seeking behavior, Summon, and Google Books. OCLC Systems Services, 25(3), 153–155. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10650750910982520
  26. Michel, S. (2009). Reflections from Menucha. OLA Quarterly, 15(1), 13–16. Retrieved from http://www.olaweb.org/assets/documents/olaq_15no1.pdf
  27. Morgan, E. L. (2009). “Next-Generation” Library Catalogs. In IOLUG Meeting. Retrieved from http://infomotions.com/musings/ngc4purdue/
  28. Neubauer, W., & Piguet, A. (2009). The Knowledge Portal, or the vision of easy access to information. Library Hi Tech, 27(4), 594–601. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07378830911007691
  29. Ruthven, T. (2009). Primo at UNSW: search first and beyond. In IGeLU 2009 Conference Helsinki. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/primo-unsw.pdf
  30. Sadler, B. (2009). Blacklight as a unified discovery platform. In Code4Lib 2009. Retrieved from http://code4lib.org/conference/2009/sadler
  31. Sapon-White, R. (2009). Legacy Metadata and the New Catalog. OLA Quarterly, 15(1), 28–30. Retrieved from http://www.olaweb.org/assets/documents/olaq_15no1.pdf
  32. Starkweather, W., & Stowers, E. (2009). Smartphones: A Potential Discovery Tool. Information Technology and Libraries, 28(4), 187–188. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v28i4.3231
  33. Stevenson, K., Elsegood, S., Seaman, D., Pawlek, C., & Nielsen, M. P. (2009). Next-generation library catalogues: reviews of Encore, Primo, Summon and Summa. Serials: The Journal for the Serials Community, 22(1), 68–82. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1629/2268
  34. Tam, W., Cox, A. M., & Bussey, A. (2009). Student user preferences for features of next-generation OPACs: A case study of University of Sheffield international students. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 43(4), 349–374. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00330330910998020
  35. Wang, J., & Lim, A. (2009). Local touch and global reach: The next generation of network-level information discovery and delivery services in a digital landscape. Library Management, 30(1/2), 25–34. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01435120910927493