2008

Last Updated: March 5, 2015

  1. Breeding, M. (2008). Beyond the current generation of next-generation library interfaces: deeper search. Computers in Libraries, 28(5), 39–42. Retrieved from http://www.librarytechnology.org/ltg-displaytext.pl?RC=13202
  2. Breeding, M. (2008). Progress on the DLF ILS Discovery Interface API: The Berkeley Accord. Information Standards Quarterly, 20(3), 18–19. Retrieved from http://www.niso.org/apps/group_public/download.php/5637/ISQv20no3.pdf
  3. Carlin, AnnaDonlan, R. (2008). Exactness Is Sometimes Key, but Keywords Are Not Exactly Exact: Discovery Tools and the OPAC, Part Two. The Reference Librarian, 49(1), 93–97. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02763870802103886
  4. Evans, G., & Cleveland, S. (2008). Moody Blues: The Social Web, Tagging, and Nontextual Discovery Tools for Music. Music Reference Services Quarterly, 11(3-4), 177–201. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10588160802541210
  5. Herm, K., & Volz, S. (2008). The Library Search Engine: A Smart Solution for Integrating Resources Beyond Library Holdings. Code4Lib Journal, 4. Retrieved from http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/142
  6. Hill, J. S. (2008). Is it worth it? Management issues related to database quality. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 46(1), 5–26. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639370802182885
  7. Jenks, H. (2008). Utilising tools for discovery. In VALA2008 Proceedings (pp. 1–13). Retrieved from http://www.vala.org.au/vala2008-proceedings/vala2008-session-9-jenks
  8. Joint, N. (2008). SUPrimo at the University of Strathclyde. In IGeLU 2008 Conference Madrid. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/17a_joint.pdf
  9. Lewis, N. (2008). Implementing Ex Libris’s Primo at the University of East Anglia. Ariadne, 55(55), (Online). Retrieved from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue55/lewis/
  10. Maisonneuve, M. (2008). Dix bonnes raisons de choisir un opac de nouvelle génération. Documentaliste- Sciences de L’information, 45(3), 16–17. Retrieved from http://www.toscaconsultants.fr/articles/10bonnesraisons.pdf
  11. Maisonneuve, M. (2008). Le catalogue de la bibliothèque à l’heure du web 2.0 : étude des opacs de nouvelle génération (p. 305). Paris: A.D.B.S. Editions.
  12. Mann, T. (2008). The Changing Nature of the Catalog and Its Integration with Other Discovery Tools. Final Report: March 17, 2006. Prepared for the Library of Congress by Karen Calhoun. A Critical Review. Journal of Library Metadata, 8(2), 169–197. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10911360802087374
  13. Marcin, S., & Morris, P. (2008). OPAC: The Next Generation: Placing an Encore Front End Onto a SirsiDynix ILS. Computers in Libraries, 28(5), 6–12. Retrieved from http://www.iii.com/news/reprints/EncoreWithSirsiDynix.pdf
  14. Sadeh, T. (2008). User experience in the library: a case study. New Library World, 109(1/2), 7–24. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03074800810845976
  15. Safley, E. (2008). Discovering the Library: Finding the Hidden Barriers to Success Using the Catalog. In 2008 IATUL PROCEEDINGS. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul/2008/papers/27/
  16. Stewart, M. (2008). Primo Implementation at the British Library. In IGeLU 2008 Conference Madrid. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/17a_stewart.pdf
  17. Thomas, J., Ekkel, T., & Mouw, J. (2008). AquaBrowser Innovations at the University of Chicago. The Charleston Advisor, 9(3), 56–58. Retrieved from http://charleston.publisher.ingentaconnect.com/content/charleston/chadv/2008/00000009/00000003/art00018