Bibliography by Author

Last Updated: August 31st, 2016

  1. Abbs, F., & Collier-Wilson, R. (2015). How is our Discovery System Perceived by Users? In IGeLU 2015 Conference Budapest. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/11.22How-is-our-Discovery-System-Perceived-by-Users_RCW_FA.pps
  2. Abdul Aziz, N. (2012). Discovering the Resource Mining Experience in your Library. In Conference on GenNEXT Libraries 2012, University Brunei Darussalam, 8th–10th October 2012 . doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.96599
  3. Aharony, N., & Prebor, G. (2015). Librarians’ and Information Professionals’ Perspectives Towards Discovery Tools — An Exploratory Study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.05.003
  4. Ajamie, L. (2015). Discovering User Behavior in your Discovery System: Custom Google Analytics Event Tracking. In IGeLU 2015 Conference Budapest. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Ajamie-discovering-user-behavior-in-your-discovery-system.pptx
  5. Albitz, R. (2012). Facilitating Content Discovery and the Value of the Publisher Platform—An Overview. In Charleston Conference Proceedings 2012 (pp. 415–418). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5703/1288284315135
  6. Alderman, J. (2014). Discovery Tool. Beginning Library & Information Systems Strategies, 3 p. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unf.edu/bliss/13
  7. Allen, N. D. (2015). Utilizing Discovery Tools for Classrooms: How Do Librarian Attitudes on Discovery Impact Tools They Teach? Library Hi Tech News, 32(1), 8–12. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-09-2014-0078
  8. Allison, D. (2016). OAI-PMH Harvested Collections and User Engagement. Journal of Web Librarianship, 10(1), 14–27. http://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2015.1128867
  9. Allison, D. (2010). Information Portals: The Next Generation Catalog. Journal of Web Librarianship, 4(4), 375–389. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2010.507972
  10. Anderson, S. R. (2013). Discovery and Mental Models. Against The Grain, 25(4), 14–16.
  11. Arlitsch, K., Obrien, P., Clark, J. A., Young, S. W. H., & Rossmann, D. (2014). Demonstrating Library Value at Network Scale: Leveraging the Semantic Web With New Knowledge Work. Journal of Library Administration, 54(5), 413–425. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2014.946778
  12. Arnett, B., & Forrestal, V. (2012). Bridging the Gap from Wikipedia to Scholarly Sources: A Simple Discovery Tool. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 19(2-4), 176–188. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2012.693361
  13. Asher, A. D., Duke, L. M., & Wilson, S. (2013). Paths of Discovery: Comparing the Search effectiveness of EBSCO Discovery Service, Summon, Google Scholar, and Conventional Library Resources. College & Research Libraries, 74(5), 464–488. Retrieved from http://crl.acrl.org/content/74/5/464
  14. Aswathy, S. (2015). Webscale Discovery Tools: A Solution for Inestimable Online Resources. In S. Thanuskodi (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Inventive Digital Tools for Collection Management and Development in Modern Libraries (pp. 69–85). IGI Global. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8178-1.ch005
  15. Ávila-García, L., Ortiz-Repiso, V., & Rodríguez-Mateos, D. (2015). Herramientas de descubrimiento: ¿una ventanilla única? Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 38(1), 1–17. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/redc.2015.1.1178
  16. Ávila García, L. (2013, November 21). Herramientas de descubrimiento en bibliotecas universitarias. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10835/2569
  17. Axford, M. A. (2012). Ultimate Debate Program on Web-Scale Discovery Services. A Report of the LITA Internet Resources and Services Interest Group Meeting, American Library AssAxford, M. A. (2012). Ultimate Debate Program on Web-Scale Discovery Services. A Report of the LITA I. Technical Services Quarterly, 29(2), 142–147. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2012.650937
  18. Aymonin, D., Borel, A., Grolimund, R., Guignard, T., Iffland, G., & Walter, L. (2011). Be realistic, demand the impossible: Comparison of 4 discovery tools using real data at the EPFL Library (pp. 1–32). Lausanne. Retrieved from http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/172947/files/EPFL-discovery-techreport-20111219_1.pdf
  19. Azadbakht, E. S., & Polacek, K. M. (2015). Information Literacy Instruction with Primo. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 54(3), 23–26. Retrieved from http://journals.ala.org/rusq/article/view/5638
  20. Aznar-Lafont, D. (2014). Las herramientas de descubrimiento: los nuevos sistemas de búsqueda global en las bibliotecas académicas. In Á. Baraibar (Ed.), Visibilidad y divulgación de la investigación desde las Humanidades Digitales. Experiencias y proyectos (pp. 253–262). Pamplona: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10171/35724
  21. Babbitt, E. P., Foster, A., & Rossmann, D. (2012). Implementation of Resource Discovery: Lessons Learned. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 598–607). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch035
  22. Babitchev, V., Hamedinger, W., & Putz, M. (2009). Primo – ein Konsortialmodell für den Österreichischen Bibliothekenverbund (und darüber hinaus). In 30. Österreichischen Bibliothekartag Graz, 16. September 2009. Retrieved from http://www.obvsg.at/fileadmin/files/obvsg/publ/bibtag09_primo_konsortialmodell.pdf
  23. Babu, P. B., & Krishnamurthy, M. (2013). Library automation to resource discovery: a review of emerging challenges. Electronic Library, 31(4), 433–451. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EL-11-2011-0159
  24. Back, G., & Bailey, A. (2014). Hacking Summon 2.0 The Elegant Way. Code4Lib Journal, (26). Retrieved from http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/10018
  25. Bacon, V., & Boyer, G. (2013). Beyond Discovery Tools: The Evolution of Discovery at ECU Libraries. Against The Grain, 25(4), 28–31. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10342/4279
  26. Badke, W. (2015). Whatever Happened to Browse. Online Searcher, 39(2), 71–73.
  27. Bair, S., Boston, G., & Garrison, S. (2011). Taming Lightning in More Than One Bottle: Implementing a Local Next-Generation Catalog Versus a Hosted Web-Scale Discovery Service. In ACRL 2011, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, March 30-April 2, 2011 (pp. 448–458). Chicago, IL: American Library Association. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/library_pubs/21/
  28. Bakkalbasi, N., & Goertzen, M. (2015). Exploring academic e-book use: part I through text analysis. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 16(3), 252–262. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/PMM-10-2015-0035
  29. Baldwin, D., Kucsak, M., & Eng, A. (2012). Don’t Touch that String! There Went the Databases. Information Outlook, 16(5), 24–32. Retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/michael_kucsak/2/
  30. Bales, A. B., & Dehmlow, M. (2012). Implementing Primo for the Michiana Academic Library Consortium (MALC). In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 562–579). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch033
  31. Ballard, T. (2011). Comparison of User Search Behaviors with Classic Online Catalogs and Discovery Platforms. The Charleston Advisor, 12(3), 65–66(2). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5260/chara.12.3.65
  32. Balnaves, E. (2013). From OPAC to Archive: integrated discovery and digital libraries with open source. In IFLA WLIC 2013 – Singapore – Future Libraries: Infinite Possibilities (pp. 1–7). IFLA. Retrieved from http://library.ifla.org/id/eprint/79
  33. Balnaves, E. (2012). Reigniting the OPAC as a metadata hub. In VALA2012 Proceedings (pp. 1–11). Retrieved from http://www.vala.org.au/vala2012-proceedings/vala2012-session-5-balnaves
  34. Baron, C. (2015). Lessons learned – Aufbau eines zentralen Discovery Services. In 104. Deutscher Bibliothekartag in Nürnberg 2015. Nürnberg. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:0290-opus4-17800
  35. Baron, C. (2014). Das Projekt „Schnellsuche NRW” – Discovery für alle? ProLibris, 19(3), 120–121. Retrieved from http://www.bibliotheken-nrw.de/fileadmin/Dateien/Daten/ProLibris/ProLibris-3-14-Webansicht.pdf
  36. Baron, C. (2014). DigiBib IntrOX: Das Portal als OPAC, Discovery und mehr. Bibliotheksdienst, 49(1), 4–13. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bd-2015-0003
  37. Bartlakowski, K. (2015). Make the library really look more like google. Bibliotheksdienst, 49(6), 643–648. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bd-2015-0073
  38. Bauder, J. (2016). Discovery on a Shoestring: Implementing a Full-Functioned Discovery Tool with Free Software and No-Extra-Charge Metadata Sources. In K. Varnum (Ed.), Exploring Discovery: The Front Door to your Library’s Licensed and Digitized Content (pp. 63–72). Chicago, IL: ALA Editions.
  39. Bauder, J. (2012). Using VuFind, XAMPP, and Flash Drives to Build an Offline Library Catalog for Use in a Liberal Arts in Prison Program. Code4Lib Journal, (16). Retrieved from http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/6225
  40. Bauer, K., Friscia, M., & Matheson, S. (2012). From the Catalog to the Book on the Shelf: Building a Mapping Application for Vufind. Code4Lib Journal, (17). Retrieved from http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/6924
  41. Baumann, A. (2011). Stärken und Schwächen von Discovery Diensten am Beispiel des EBSCO Discovery Service. HTW Chur. Retrieved from http://www.htwchur.ch/uploads/media/CSI_49_Baumann.pdf
  42. BeDell, S., & Trudell, L. (2010). Does Taxonomy Matter in a New World of Search and Discovery. Online, 34(5). Retrieved from http://www.infotoday.com/online/sep10/BeDell-Trudell.shtml
  43. Becher, M., & Schmidt, K. (2011). Taking Discovery Systems for a Test Drive. Journal of Web Librarianship, 5(3), 199–219. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2011.583134
  44. Belford, R. (2014). Evaluating Library Discovery Tools through a Music Lens. Library Resources & Technical Services, 51(1), 49–72. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/lrts.58n1.49
  45. Belford, R., Snyder, T., & Randall, K. M. (2014). Discovering Music: Small-Scale, Web-Scale, Facets, and Beyond. The Serials Librarian, 66(1-4), 174–181. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2014.880038
  46. Berg, J. (2014). From Here to Discovery. In 2014 ALA Annual Conference. Retrieved from http://fr.scribd.com/doc/232939824/From-Here-to-Discovery-Poster-for-ALA-14
  47. Bertelmann, R., Szott, S., & Höhnow, T. (2012). Discovery jenseits von “all you can eat” und “one size fits all.” Bibliothek Forschung Und Praxis, 36(3), 369-376. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bfp-2012-0050
  48. Bertot, J. C., Berube, K., Devereaux, P., Dhakal, K., Powers, S., & Ray, J. (2012). Assessing the Usability of WorldCat Local: Findings and Considerations. The Library Quarterly, 82(2), 207–221. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/664588
  49. Betz, S., & Roberton, I. (2016). Integrating Discovery to Improve the User Experience. In K. Varnum (Ed.), Exploring Discovery: The Front Door to your Library’s Licensed and Digitized Content (pp. 155–168). Chicago, IL: ALA Editions.
  50. Bhatnagar, G., Dennis, S., Duque, G., Henry, S., MacEachern, M., Teasley, S., & Varnum, K. (2010). Article Discovery Working Group Final Report (p. 30). Retrieved from http://www.lib.umich.edu/files/adwg/final-report.pdf
  51. Bhebhe, S., Ngwenya, S., & Shroff, R. H. (2016). Adoption and Use of Discovery Tools by Selected Academic Libraries in Zimbabwe. In E. de Smet & S. Dhamdhere (Eds.), E-Discovery Tools and Applications in Modern Libraries (pp. 168–180). IGI Global. http://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0474-0.ch009
  52. Bietila, D., & Olson, T. (2012). Designing an Evaluation Process for Resource Discovery Tools. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 122–136). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch008
  53. Birkner, M. (2015). VuFind an der AK Bibliothek Wien. Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen & Bibliothekare, 68(1), 79–90. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10760/25124
  54. Blandford, L. (2015). Introducing LibrarySearch at the University of Kent. Refer: Journal of the ISG, 31(1). Retrieved from https://referisg.wordpress.com/2015/03/01/introducing-librarysearch-at-the-university-of-kent/
  55. Blenkle, M., Ellis, R., & Haake, E. (2009). Next-generation library catalogues: review of E-LIB. Serials: The Journal for the Serials Community, 22(2), 178–181. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1629/22178
  56. Böhner, D. (2013). Verbessern Discovery Systeme die Informationskompetenz? 027.7 Zeitschrift für Bibliothekskultur / Journal for Library Culture, 1(2). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12685/027.7-1-2-26
  57. Bollinger, S., & Silton, K. (2016). When You Rent Your Front Door: A Midsize Library’s Experiences Relying on Discovery Vendors. In K. Varnum (Ed.), Exploring Discovery: The Front Door to your Library’s Licensed and Digitized Content (pp. 27–34). Chicago, IL: ALA Editions.
  58. Borchert, T., & Fischer, E. (2015). Is Your Discovery Tool REALLY Better than Google? In 2015 Library Technology Conference, Macalester College, St. Paul – March 18-19. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/libtech_conf/2015/sessions/36
  59. Borchert, F., & Keidel, P. (2014). Und sie bewegt sich doch! Der Einsatz eines Thesaurus zur Unterstützung der Sacherschließung in einem Discoverysystem. B.I.T. Online, 17(5), 456–463.
  60. Borg, M., & Donoghue, A. (2012). Information Literacy in a Web-Scale Discovery World – A Case Study of User Experience vs Content at Sheffield Hallam University, UK. In R. Gwyer, R. Stubbings, & G. Walton (Eds.), The Road to Information Literacy: Librarians as facilitators of learning (pp. 201-214). De Gruyter Saur. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110281002.201
  61. Boston, G., & Garrison, S. (2010). Harvesting From Many Silos at Web-scale Makes E-content Truly Discoverable. In Electronic Resources & Libraries (ER&L) 2010. Retrieved from http://fr.slideshare.net/EResourcesLibraries/harvesting-from-many-silos-at-webscale-makes-econtent-truly-discoverable
  62. Botzer, M. (2015). Delivering the experience that users expect: Core principles for designing library discovery services. Retrieved from http://meetexlibris.com/designing-library-discovery-services/
  63. Bowen, J. (2013). Metadata to Support Next-Generation Library Resource Discovery: Lessons from the eXtensible Catalog, Phase 1. Information Technology and Libraries, 27(2), 6–19. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v27i2.3253
  64. Boyer, G. M., & Besaw, M. (2012). A Study of Librarians’ Perceptions and Use of the Summon Discovery Tool. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 9(3), 173–183. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15424065.2012.707056
  65. Branch, D. (2015). Successful E-Resource Acquisitions: Looking Beyond Selecting, Ordering, Paying, and Receiving to Discovery and Access. In 2014 Charleston Library Conference. Purdue University. Purdue e-Pubs. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/charleston/2014/Collection/8/
  66. Brandsma, T. W., & Conger, M. J. (2014). Influencing success: Configuring the WorldCat knowledgebase with user needs in mind. Serials Review. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2014.947020
  67. Breckbill, A. (2012). The Trial of Searching for Musical Works Using Resource Discovery Tools. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 662–676). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch040
  68. Breeding, M. (2016). Data from Library Implementations. Library Technology Reports, 52(4), 29–35. Retrieved from https://journals.ala.org/ltr/article/view/5975
  69. Breeding, M. (2016). The Current State of Privacy and Security of Automation and Discovery Products. Library Technology Reports, 52(4), 13–28. Retrieved from https://journals.ala.org/ltr/article/view/5974
  70. Breeding, M. (2015). The Future of Library Resource Discovery: A white paper commissioned by the NISO Discovery to Delivery (D2D) Topic Committee (pp. 1–49). Baltimore, MD: NISO. Retrieved from http://www.niso.org/apps/group_public/download.php/14487/future_library_resource_discovery.pdf
  71. Breeding, M. (2015). Relationship with Discovery. Library Technology Reports, 51(4), 22–25. Retrieved from https://journals.ala.org/ltr/article/view/5688/7067
  72. Breeding, M. (2015). Working out the Future of Library Resource Discovery. In NISO Forum: The Future of Library Resource Discovery. Baltimore, Maryland. Retrieved from http://fr.slideshare.net/BaltimoreNISO/2015-niso-forum-the-future-of-library-resource-discovery-53559730
  73. Breeding, M. (2015). Library Systems Report 2015. American Libraries, 46(5), 28–41.
  74. Breeding, M., & Brooks, S. (2015). A Discussion on Discovery. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wG6H_xV85kM
  75. Breeding, M. (2014). Library Resource Discovery Products: Context, Library Perspectives, and Vendor Positions. Library Technology Reports, 50(1), 5–58. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/ltr.50n1
  76. Breeding, M. (2014). Library Systems Report 2014: Competition and strategic cooperation. American Libraries. Retrieved from http://www.americanlibrariesmagazine.org/article/library-systems-report-2014
  77. Breeding, M. (2014). The Systems Librarian. Enhancing Discovery Through Better Exposure. Computers in Libraries, 34(8), 24–26.
  78. Breeding, M. (2014). Web-Scale Discovery Services. American Libraries, 45(1/2), 25–25. Retrieved from http://www.americanlibrariesmagazine.org/article/web-scale-discovery-services
  79. Breeding, M. (2013). Automation Marketplace 2013: The Rush to Innovate. The Digital Shift, April. Retrieved from http://www.thedigitalshift.com/2013/04/ils/automation-marketplace-2013-the-rush-to-innovate/
  80. Breeding, M. (2013). Next-generation discovery: an overview of the European scene. In S. Chambers (Ed.), Catalogue 2.0: The future of the library catalog (pp. 37–64). London: Facet Publishing.
  81. Breeding, M. (2012). Current and future trends in information technologies for information units. Profesional de La Informacion, 21(1), 9–15. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2012.ene.02
  82. Breeding, M. (2012). Looking Forward to the Next Generation of Discovery Services. Computers in Libraries, 32(2), 28–32. Retrieved from http://www.librarytechnology.org/ltg-displaytext.pl?RC=16731
  83. Breeding, M. (2012). Tendencias actuales y futuras en tecnologías de la información para unidades de información. Profesional de La Informacion, 21(1), 9–15. Retrieved from http://www.elprofesionaldelainformacion.com/breeding-espanol.pdf
  84. Breeding, M. (2011). Building Comprehensive Resource Discovery Platforms. Smart Libraries Newsletter, 31(3). Retrieved from http://www.alatechsource.org/blog/2011/03/building-comprehensive-resource-discovery-platforms.html
  85. Breeding, M. (2011). Discovering Harry Pottery Barn. Computers in Libraries, 31(2), 21–23. Retrieved from http://voyager.pba.edu/library/docs/Breeding2.pdf
  86. Breeding, M. (2011). Library Web-Scale. Computers in Libraries, 32(1), 19–22. Retrieved from http://www.librarytechnology.org/ltg-displaytext.pl?RC=16577
  87. Breeding, M. (2010). State of the Art in Library Discovery 2010. Computers in Libraries, 30(1), 31–35. Retrieved from http://www.librarytechnology.org/ltg-displaytext.pl?RC=14574
  88. Breeding, M. (2009). Open Discovery Interfaces. American Libraries, 40(6/7), 40–40. Retrieved from http://www.americanlibrariesmagazine.org/article/open-discovery-interfaces
  89. Breeding, M. (2008). Beyond the current generation of next-generation library interfaces: deeper search. Computers in Libraries, 28(5), 39–42. Retrieved from http://www.librarytechnology.org/ltg-displaytext.pl?RC=13202
  90. Breeding, M. (2008). Progress on the DLF ILS Discovery Interface API: The Berkeley Accord. Information Standards Quarterly, 20(3), 18–19. Retrieved from http://www.niso.org/apps/group_public/download.php/5637/ISQv20no3.pdf
  91. Breeding, M. (2007). Next-Generation Library Catalogs. Library Technology Reports, 43(4), 1–44. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/ltr
  92. Breeding, M. (2007). The Birth of a New Generation of Library Interfaces. Computers in Libraries, 27(9), 34–37. Retrieved from http://www.librarytechnology.org/ltg-displaytext.pl?RC=12880
  93. Breeding, M. (2007). Thinking About Your Next OPAC. Computers in Libraries, 27(4), 28–31. Retrieved from http://www.librarytechnology.org/ltg-displaytext.pl?RC=12575
  94. Breeding, M., Arnold, A. N., Nagy, A., & Jung, B. (2013). Discovery Services: The Future of Library Systems [Video broadcast]. American Libraries Live. Retrieved from http://americanlibrarieslive.org/blog/archive-discovery-services-future-library-systems
  95. Breitbach, W. (2012). Web-Scale Discovery: A Library of Babel? In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 637–645). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch038
  96. Brennan, D. P. (2012). Details, Details, Details: Issues in Planning for, Implementing, and Using Resource Discovery Tools. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 44–56). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch003
  97. Brett, K. (2016). Report of the ALCTS Catalog Form and Function Interest Group Meeting. American Library Association Midwinter Meeting, Chicago, January 2015. Technical Services Quarterly, 33(1), 59–61. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2015.1093836
  98. Brett, K. R., Lierman, A., & Turner, C. (2016). Lessons Learned: A Primo Usability Study. Information Technology and Libraries, 35(1). http://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v35i1.8965
  99. Brians, C., & Pencek, B. (2012). Discovery Systems: Analyzing the Gap Between Professors’ Expectations and Student Behavior. In Charleston Conference Proceedings 2012 (pp. 419–423). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5703/1288284315136
  100. Brigham, T. J., Farrell, A. M., Osterhaus Trzasko, L. C., Attwood, C. A., Wentz, M. W., & Arp, K. A. (2016). Web-Scale Discovery Service: Is It Right for Your Library? Mayo Clinic Libraries Experience. Journal of Hospital Librarianship, 16(1), 25–39. http://doi.org/10.1080/15323269.2016.1118280
  101. Brink-Drescher, J. (2014). VuFind: A NextGen Overlay. The Charleston Advisor, 16(2), 46–54. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5260/chara.16.2.46
  102. Brooks, S. (2013). Discovery: It’s About the End User. Against The Grain, 25(4), 18–18.
  103. Brown-Sica, M., Beall, J., & McHale, N. (2010). Next-Generation Library Catalogs and the Problem of Slow Response Time. Information Technology and Libraries, 29(4), 214–223. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v29i4.3132
  104. Browning, S. (2015). The Discovery–Collection Librarian Connection: Cultivating Collaboration for Better Discovery. Collection Management, 40(4), 197–206. http://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2015.1093985
  105. Brubaker, N., Leach-Murray, S., & Parker, S. (2011). Shapes in the Cloud: Finding the Right Discovery Layer. Online, 35(2), 20–26. Retrieved from http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/infotoday/doc/854996409.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT:PAGE&type=current&date=Mar/Apr%202011&author=Noah%20Brubaker;Susan%20Leach-Murray;Sherri%20Parker&pub=Online&edition=&startpage=20&desc=Shapes%20in%20the%20Cloud:%20Finding%20the%20Right%20Discovery%20Layer
  106. Brubaker, N., Leach-Murray, S., & Parker, S. (2012). Implementing a Discovery Layer: A Rookie’s Season. Computers in Libraries, 32(3), 12–18. Retrieved from http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/infotoday/access/2639663841.html
  107. Brunning, D., & Machovec, G. (2010). An Interview with Nancy Dushkin, VP Discovery and Delivery Solutions at Ex Libris, Regarding Primo Central. The Charleston Advisor, 12(2), 58–59. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5260/chara.12.2.58
  108. Brunning, D., & Machovec, G. (2010). Interview About Summon with Jane Burke, Vice President of Serials Solutions. The Charleston Advisor, 11(4), 60–62. Retrieved from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/charleston/chadv/2010/00000011/00000004/art00017
  109. Bryant, S., & Ye, G. (2015). From Discovery to Delivery: Successful Systems Integration. Technical Services Quarterly, 32(4), 383–389. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2015.1059678
  110. Buchanan, S. (2014). The platypus and the sausage: teaching Summon across diverse subjects at Sheffield Hallam University. In E. Coonan (Ed.), Teaching, not telling: Proceedings of the 2nd UK Information Literacy and Summon Day, Manchester Metropolitan University, 25 July 2013 (pp. 5–11). Retrieved from http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/13524/1/IL_and_summon_2014_proceedings.pdf
  111. Buck, S., & Mellinger, M. (2011). The Impact of Serial Solutions’ SummonTM on Information Literacy Instruction: Librarian Perceptions. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 16, 159–181. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2011.621864
  112. Buck, S., & Nichols, J. (2012). Beyond the Search Box: Using Participatory Design to Elicit Librarians’ Preferences for Unified Discovery Search Results Pages. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 51(3), 235–245. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/rusq.51n3.235
  113. Buck, S., & Steffy, C. (2013). Promising Practices in Instruction of Discovery Tools. Communications in Information Literacy, 7(1), 66–80.
  114. Bull, S., & Craft, E. (2013). How we FindIt@Bham using Primo. In IGeLU 2013 Conference Berlin. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/11.51-Bull-Craft.pptx
  115. Bull, S., & Craft, E. (2014). How we FindIt@Bham using Primo. SCONUL Focus, (60), 47–53. Retrieved from http://www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/15_15.pdf
  116. Bull, S., Craft, E., & Dodds, A. (2014). Evaluation of a Resource Discovery Service: FindIt@Bham. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 20(2), 137-166. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2014.897238
  117. Bulock, C., Hosburgh, N., & Mann, S. (2015). OA in the Library Collection: The Challenges of Identifying and Maintaining Open Access Resources. The Serials Librarian, 68(1-4), 79–86. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2015.1023690
  118. Bulock, C., & Fields, L. (2013). Discovery on a Budget: Improved Searching without a Web-Scale Discovery Product. The Serials Librarian, 64(1-4), 129–136. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2013.760401
  119. Burchill, M. K., & Rasmussen, N. (2014). Implementing VuFind: A Public Library Improves Electronic Search Quality and Saves Searcher Time. Public Library Quarterly, 33(1), 76–82. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2014.877718
  120. Burke, J. (2010). Discovery versus disintermediation: the new reality driven by today’s end-user. In VALA2010 Proceedings (pp. 1–11). Retrieved from http://www.vala.org.au/vala2010-proceedings/vala2010-session-1-burke
  121. Butler, A., & Thompson, L. (2013). Implementing Discovery at the University of North Alabama. The Southeastern Librarian, 61(1), 44–47. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/seln/vol61/iss1/7
  122. Cai, H. (Heather), Dou, T., & Jiang, A. (2011). Effective Approaches to the Evaluation and Selection of a Discovery Tool. In Digital Libraries: For Cultural Heritage, Knowledge Dissemination, and Future Creation: 13th International Conference on Asia-Pacific Digital Libraries, ICADL 2011, Beijing, China, October 24-27, 2011. Proceedings (pp. 347–356). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24826-9_43
  123. Calarco, P., Conrad, L., Kessler, R., & Vandenburg, M. (2015). Metadata Challenges in Library Discovery Systems. In 2014 Charleston Library Conference. Purdue University. Purdue e-Pubs. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/charleston/2014/Tech/3/
  124. Calhoun, K. (2006). The changing nature of the catalog and its integration with other discovery tools: prepared for the Library of Congress (p. 52). Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/catdir/calhoun-report-final.pdf
  125. Calhoun, K., Cantrell, J., Gallagher, P., & Hawk, J. (2009). Online Catalogs: What Users and Librarians Want. Dublin, OH: OCLC Online Computer Library Center. Retrieved from http://oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/reports/onlinecatalogs/fullreport.pdf
  126. Calvert, K. (2015). Maximizing academic library collections: measuring changes in use patterns owing to EBSCO Discovery Service. College & Research Libraries, 76(1), 81–99. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/crl.76.1.81
  127. Caplan, P. (2012). On discovery tools, OPACs and the motion of library language. Library Hi Tech, 30(1), 108–115. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07378831211213247
  128. Cardwell, C., Lux, V., & Snyder, R. J. (2012). Beyond simple, easy, and fast: Reflections on teaching Summon. College & Research Libraries News, 73(6), 344–347. Retrieved from http://crln.acrl.org/content/73/6/344.full
  129. Carlin, AnnaDonlan, R. (2008). Exactness Is Sometimes Key, but Keywords Are Not Exactly Exact: Discovery Tools and the OPAC, Part Two. The Reference Librarian, 49(1), 93–97. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02763870802103886
  130. Carpenter, T., Heterick, B., & Bernier, S. (2015). Driving Discovery: Do You Have the Keys to Fair Linking? (It’s About Knowledge and Library Control). In 2014 Charleston Library Conference. Purdue University. Purdue e-Pubs. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/charleston/2014/Plenaries/15/
  131. Carter, J. (2009). Editorial Board Thoughts: Issue Introduction. Discovery: What Do You Mean by That? Information Technology and Libraries, 28(4), 161–163. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v28i4.3226
  132. Cassidy, E. D., Jones, G., McMain, L., Shen, L., & Vieira, S. (2014). Student Searching with EBSCO Discovery: A Usability Study. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 26(1), 17–35. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1941126X.2014.877331
  133. Castaldo, J., Dulaney, C., Klingler, T., Rossmann, D., & Wrubel, L. (2011). Experiences from the Field: Choosing a Discovery Tool for YOUR Unique Library. In Charleston Conference Proceedings 2011 (pp. 563–569). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5703/1288284314966
  134. Celik, M. (2015). Real-time analytics/metrics dashboard in Primo. In IGeLU 2015 Conference Budapest. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/10.22__primo_analytics__mehmet_celik.pdf
  135. Chambers, S. (Ed.). (2013). Catalogue 2.0: The future of the library catalogue (p. 240). London: Facet Publishing.
  136. Chad, K. (2016). Rethinking the Library Services Platform (Higher Education Library Technology briefing paper No. 2). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4989.4481
  137. Chan, P. W., Johnson, D., & Ngian, L. C. (2009). Search Less Find More: Redefining Search Environments to Accommodate New User Behaviors. Singapore Journal of Library & Information Management, 38, 1–12. Retrieved from http://www.las.org.sg/sjlim/SJLIM20091NgianSearch.pdf
  138. Chapman, S., Dennis, S., Folger, K., & Varnum, K. (2012). Developing a User-Centered Article Discovery Environment. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 194–224). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch012
  139. Chase, D., Trapasso, E., & Tolliver, R. (2016). The Perfect Storm: Examining User Experience and Conducting a Usability Test to Investigate a Disruptive Academic Library Web Site Redevelopment. Journal of Web Librarianship, 10(1), 28–44. http://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2015.1124740
  140. Chatterjee, P., & Das, D. (2015). Web Scale Discovery Service And Tools With Special Reference To Central Library, IIT Kharagpur. International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, 2(3), 677–686. Retrieved from http://ijiset.com/vol2/v2s3/IJISET_V2_I3_109.pdf
  141. Chen, D., Lu, Y., & Yang, M. (2012). ). 陈定权, 卢玉红, 杨敏. 图书馆资源发现系统的现状与趋势 [Library Discovery Systems: Status Quo and Future Trends]. 图书情报工作 [Library and Information Service], 56(7), 44–48. Retrieved from http://159.226.100.150:8085/lis/CN/Y2012/V56/I7/44
  142. Chickering, F. W., & Yang, S. Q. (2014). Evaluation and Comparison of Discovery Tools: An Update. Information Technology and Libraries, 33(2), 5–30. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v33i2.3471
  143. Chilimo, W. (2014). Next-Generation Catalogues: How are the Academic Libraries in Kenya Faring? Mousaion, 32(3), 93–118.
  144. Christel, M., Koehler, J., & Upfold, M. (2012). Implementing a Discovery Layer in a Consortial Environment. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 407–418). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch023
  145. Chumbe, S., Kelly, B., & MacLeod, R. (2015). Hybrid Journals: Ensuring Systematic and Standard Discoverability of the Latest Open Access Articles. The Serials Librarian, 68(1-4), 143–155. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2015.1016856
  146. Chumbe, S., MacLeod, R., & Kelly, B. (2015). We Should Not Light an Open Access Lamp and then Hide it Under a Bushel! In B. Schmidt & M. Dobreva (Eds.), New Avenues for Electronic Publishing in the Age of Infinite Collections and Citizen Science: Scale, Openness and Trust (pp. 102–112). IOS Press. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-562-3-102
  147. Ciccone, K., & Vickery, J. (2015). Summon, EBSCO Discovery Service, and Google Scholar: A Comparison of Search Performance Using User Queries. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 10(1), 34–49. Retrieved from https://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/23845
  148. Clarke, E. (2006). DICE Project Final Report: Resource Discovery Tools Evaluation and Integration (p. 71). Edinburgh. Retrieved from http://www.staffs.ac.uk/COSE/DICE/DICEfinal.pdf
  149. Cmor, D., & Li, X. (2012). Beyond Boolean, Towards Thinking: Discovery Systems and Information Literacy. Library Management, 33(8/9), 450–457. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01435121211279812
  150. Cohen, R. A., & Thorpe, A. (2015). Discovering User Behavior: Applying Usage Statistics to Shape Frontline Services. The Serials Librarian, 69(1), 29–46. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2015.1040194
  151. Collins, K. J., & Verbovetskaya, A. (2014). Managing a three-ring circus: upgrading Aleph, implementing Primo, and maintaining support for a quarter million users. In IGeLU 2014 Conference Oxford. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/9.5-IGeLU_-_2014-09-16_-_Collins_Verbovetskaya_-_Managing_a_three-ring_circus.pptx
  152. Collins, M., & Rathemacher, A. J. (2010). Open Forum: The Future of Library Systems. The Serials Librarian, 58(1-4), 167–173. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03615261003625703
  153. Colson, J., & Allen, K. (2015). Our Trek to Discovery: A Tale of Implementation. Online Searcher, 39(2), 45–49. Retrieved from http://www.infotoday.com/OnlineSearcher/Articles/Features/Our-Trek-to-Discovery-A-Tale-of-Implementation-102366.shtml
  154. Comeaux, D. J. (2012). Usability Testing of a Web-Scale Discovery System at an Academic Library. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 19(2-4), 189–206. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2012.695671
  155. Connolly, M., Colt, J., Leary, J., & Wallace, M. (2016). Creating a “Magical” Request and Delivery Experience for Patrons Using a Blacklight-Based Catalog. In K. Varnum (Ed.), Exploring Discovery: The Front Door to your Library’s Licensed and Digitized Content (pp. 101–114). Chicago, IL: ALA Editions.
  156. Connor, E. (2007). Interview with Oren Beit-Arie of Ex Libris. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 4(3), 79–92. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J383v04n03_05
  157. Coonan, E. (Ed.). (2014). Teaching, not telling: Proceedings of the 2nd UK Information Literacy and Summon Day, Manchester Metropolitan University, 25 July 2013. Manchester. Retrieved from http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/13524/1/IL_and_summon_2014_proceedings.pdf
  158. Coonan, E. (2014). Going beyond “find”: a Summon before-and-after snapshot. In E. Coonan (Ed.), Teaching, not telling: Proceedings of the 2nd UK Information Literacy and Summon Day, Manchester Metropolitan University, 25 July 2013 (pp. 29–34). Retrieved from http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/13524/1/IL_and_summon_2014_proceedings.pdf
  159. Copenhaver, K., & Koclanes, A. (2016). Impact of web-scale discovery on reference inquiry. Reference Services Review, 44(3), 266–281. http://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-11-2015-0046
  160. Cornish, A. (2009). The New Summit: Building the Foundation for Enhanced User Services. OLA Quarterly, 15(1), 20–23. Retrieved from http://www.olaweb.org/assets/documents/olaq_15no1.pdf
  161. Corthouts, J., & Schaerlaekens, E. (2014). Rome is niet op één dag gebouwd: Discovery service in de UAntwerpen. META: Tijdschrift Voor Bibliotheek & Archief, (7), 12–16. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10067/1190000151162165141
  162. Craft, E. (2015). Library Maps?: Extending Primo functionality through lightboxes. In IGeLU 2015 Conference Budapest. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/5.31_EdwardCraft.pptx
  163. Cramer, T. (2010). Blacklight: Leveraging Next Generation Discovery. In The 5th International Conference on Open Repositories (OR2010), Madrid, Spain, 6-9 July 2010. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2390/biecoll-OR2010-60
  164. Crystal, A. (2010). Final Summon User Research Report (p. 29). Retrieved from http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/userstudies/studies/2010summon
  165. Dahl, M. (2009). The Evolution of Library Discovery Systems in the Web Environment. OLA Quarterly, 15(1), 5–9. Retrieved from http://www.olaweb.org/assets/documents/olaq_15no1.pdf
  166. Dahl, D., & MacDonald, P. (2012). Implementation and Acceptance of a Discovery Tool: Lessons Learned. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 366–387). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch021
  167. Dalal, H. A., Kimura, A. K., & Hofmann, M. A. (2015). Searching in the Wild: Observing Information-Seeking Behavior in a Discovery Tool. In ACRL 2015 Proceedings – March 25–28, 2015, Portland, Oregon (pp. 668–675). Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/confsandpreconfs/2015/Dalal_Kimura_Hofmann.pdf
  168. Dalton, M. (2014). The Form of Search Tool Chosen by Undergraduate Students Influences Research Practices and the Type and Quality of Information Selected. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 9(2), 19-21. Retrieved from http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/21327
  169. Daniels, J., Robinson, L., & Wishnetsky, S. (2013). Results of Web-Scale Discovery: Data, Discussions, and Decisions. The Serials Librarian, 64(1-4), 81–87. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2013.761056
  170. Daniels, J., & Roth, P. (2012). Incorporating Millennium Catalog Records into Serials Solutions’ Summon. Technical Services Quarterly, 29(3), 193–199. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2012.681283
  171. Darrington, J. (2014). A Hybrid Approach to Discovery Services: Reflections on Implementing both Primo and Summon. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 53(4), 291-295. Retrieved from http://rusa.metapress.com/content/h1j368t4461q6787/
  172. Dartmouth College Library. (2009). An evaluation of Serials Solutions Summon: as a discovery service for the Dartmouth College Library (p. 29). Dartmouth. Retrieved from http://www.dartmouth.edu/~library/admin/docs/Summon_Report.pdf
  173. Dartmouth College Library. Next Generation Library Taskforce. (2013). Next Generation Library Systems: Convenient, Connected, User-Centric, Ubiquitous (p. 32). Hanover, NH. Retrieved from http://www.dartmouth.edu/~library/admin/docs/DartmouthNextGen2013.pdf
  174. Davidson, K. S., & Collins, T. (2013). eResources in Academic Libraries: A Look Ahead. The Serials Librarian, 65(1), 59–62. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2013.800629
  175. Dazy, A. (2012). Les discovery tools en bibliothèque. In i-expo 2012. Paris. Retrieved from http://discoverytools.jimdo.com/app/download/8220399494/Dazy+André.ppt.pps?t=1372093570
  176. De Beffort, C. (2014). Le projet Explore : mise en oeuvre de Primo dans l’environnement consortial RERO. In Primo dans un contexte consortial. Paris: Association des Clients d’Ex Libris France (ACEF). Retrieved from http://acefexlibrisfr.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/rero_debeffort_v2.pdf
  177. de Keyser, P., Ciccone, K., Vickery, J., Fawley, N., Krysak, N., Ketterman, E., … Reese, P. E. (2016). Discovery Services, the Next Tool Libraries Must Have, or… Should Discard? In E. de Smet & S. Dhamdhere (Eds.), E-Discovery Tools and Applications in Modern Libraries (pp. 56–65). IGI Global. http://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0474-0.ch003
  178. de Smet, E. (2016). E-Discovery with the ABCD Information Management System. In E. de Smet & S. Dhamdhere (Eds.), E-Discovery Tools and Applications in Modern Libraries (pp. 332–357). IGI Global. http://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0474-0.ch017v
  179. de Smet, E., & Dhamdhere, S. (Eds.). (2016). E-Discovery Tools and Applications in Modern Libraries. IGI Global/Information Science Reference. http://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0474-0v
  180. Debonis, R., O’Donnell, E., & Thomes, C. (2012). (Self-) Discovery Service: Helping Students Help Themselves. Journal of Library and Information Services in Distance Learning, 6(3-4), 235–250. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2012.705648
  181. Decoster, S., & Renaville, F. (2016). Défis et opportunités des outils de découverte : côté professionnel, côté usager. In En quoi les outils de découverte changent la recherche documentaire ? Université Paris Descartes, 21 mars 2016. Paris. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2268/194784
  182. Decoster, S. (2015). Relever le défi des outils “discovery”? : les formations orientées vers l’usager. Former aux compétences informationnelles à l’heure du web 2.0 et des discovery tools. Gembloux. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2268/182048
  183. Dégarie, J., Girard, G., LeBlanc, M., & Volkanova, V. (2011). Les outils de découverte. Rapport du groupe de travail du Réseau des bibliothèques de l’Université de Moncton. Version abrégée destinée au public (p. 20). Moncton (Canada). Retrieved from http://www.couperin.org/images/stories/documents/outils_decouverte_rapport_final_abrege_mars2011.pdf
  184. Dehmlow, M. (2013). Editorial Board Thoughts: Services and User Context in the Era of Webscale Discovery. Information Technology and Libraries, 32(2), 1–3. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v32i2.5106
  185. Dehmlow, M. (2012). Primo and Primo Central: context, content, and services. In IGeLU 2012 Conference Zurich. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/igelu2012dehmlow_final_Mark_Dehmlow.pptx
  186. Dempsey, M., & Valenti, A. M. (2016). Student Use of Keywords and Limiters in Web-scale Discovery Searching. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.03.002
  187. Dempsey, L. (2013). Thirteen ways of look at the libraries, discovery and the catalogue: scale, workflow, attention. In S. Chambers (Ed.), Catalogue 2.0: The future of the library catalog. London: Facet Publishing.
  188. Dempsey, L. (2012). Thirteen Ways of Looking at Libraries, Discovery, and the Catalog: Scale, Workflow, Attention. EDUCAUSE Review Online. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/thirteen-ways-looking-libraries-discovery-and-catalog-scale-workflow-attention
  189. Dempsey, L. (2006). The Library Catalogue in the New Discovery Environment: Some Thoughts. Ariadne, 48. Retrieved from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue48/dempsey
  190. Denholm, C., Kauler, L., Lavelle, J., & Sokvitne, L. (2009). Making the new OPAC seamless: dealing with the transition from “finding” to “getting.” Library Hi Tech, 27(1), 13–29. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07378830910942883
  191. Denton, W., & Coysh, S. J. (2011). Usability testing of VuFind at an academic library. Library Hi Tech, 29(2), 301–319. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07378831111138189
  192. Deodato, J., Gambrell, K., & Frierson, E. (2016). One Size Doesn’t Fit All: Tailoring Discovery through User Testing. In K. Varnum (Ed.), Exploring Discovery: The Front Door to your Library’s Licensed and Digitized Content (pp. 183–199). Chicago, IL: ALA Editions.
  193. Deodato, J. (2015). Evaluating Web-Scale Discovery Services: A Step-by-Step Guide. Information Technology and Libraries, 34(2), 19–75. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v34i2.5745
  194. Dhamdhere, S., Lihitkar, R., Smet, E. de, & Dhamdhere, S. N. (2016). Commercial and Open Access Integrated Information Search Tools in Indian Libraries. In E. de Smet & S. Dhamdhere (Eds.), E-Discovery Tools and Applications in Modern Libraries (pp. 41–55). IGI Global. http://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0474-0.ch002v
  195. Diamond, T., Price, S., & Chandrasekar, R. (2013). Actions Speak Louder than Words: Analyzing large-scale query logs to improve the research experience. Code4Lib Journal, 21. Retrieved from http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/8693
  196. Dicovery-Systeme [Discovery-Systeme] – vom Katalograum zum Suchraum: Erfahrungen aus den Verbünden [Vorwort]. (2014). Bibliotheksdienst, 48(10), 772–772. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bd-2014-0094
  197. Diedrichs, C. P. (2009). Discovery and Delivery: Making it Work for Users. The Serials Librarian, 56(1-4), 79–93. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03615260802679127
  198. Díez, M. L. A. (2012). Redefiniendo el catálogo: Expectativas de las interfaces de descubrimiento centradas en el usuario. Investigacion Bibliotecologica, 26(56), 181–204. Retrieved from http://ref.scielo.org/9bqf49
  199. Digby, T., & Elfstrand, S. (2011). Discovering Open Source Discovery: Using VuFind to Create MnPALS Plus. Computers in Libraries, 31(2), 6–10. Retrieved from http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/infotoday/doc/855628909.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT:PAGE&type=current&date=Mar%202011&author=Todd%20Digby;Stephen%20Elfstrand&pub=Computers%20in%20Libraries&edition=&startpage=7&desc=DISCOVERING%20OPEN%20SOURCE%20DISCOVERY:%20Using%20VuFind%20to%20Create%20MnPALS%20Plus
  200. Djenno, M., Insua, G., Gregory, G. M., & Brantley, J. S. (2014). Discovering Usability: Comparing Two Discovery Systems at One Academic Library. Journal of Web Librarianship, 8(3), 263–285. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2014.933690
  201. Dogan, G., & Dogan, S. C. (2013). Evaluation of Web Discovery Services: Reflections from Turkey. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 73, 444–450. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.02.074
  202. Dolski, A. A. (2013). Information Discovery Insights Gained from MultiPAC, a Prototype Library Discovery System. Information Technology and Libraries, 28(4), 172–180. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v28i4.3228
  203. Donlan, R., & Carlin, A. (2007). A Sheep in Wolf’s Clothing: Discovery Tools and the OPAC. The Reference Librarian, 48(2), 67–71. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J120v48n02
  204. Doolan, L. (2012). A Catalogue Revolution: The British Library, Primo and the Information Literate Librarian. In R. Gwyer, R. Stubbings, & G. Walton (Eds.), The Road to Information Literacy: Librarians as facilitators of learning (pp. 49-62). De Gruyter Saur. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110281002.49
  205. Dove, J. (2013). If Filter Failure is the Problem, Then What Is Filter Success? Against The Grain, 25(4), 42.
  206. Dulle, F. W. (2015). Online Information Resources Availability and Accessibility: A Developing Countries’ Scenario. African Journal of Library, Archives & Information Science, 25(1), 45–57.
  207. Durante, K., & Hardy, D. (2015). Discovery, Management, and Preservation of Geospatial Data Using Hydra. Journal of Map & Geography Libraries, 11(2), 123–154. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15420353.2015.1041630
  208. Durante, K., & Wang, Z. (2012). Creating an Actionable Assessment Framework for Discovery Services in Academic Libraries. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 19(2-4), 215–228. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2012.693358
  209. Edwards, H. (2015). How Useful are Library Discovery Tools? Refer: Journal of the ISG, 31(1), 8–11. Retrieved from https://referisg.wordpress.com/2015/03/01/how-useful-are-library-discovery-tools/
  210. Edwards, J. A., & Hill, V. (2014). Thinking about keywords and searching Summon as in-class group activity. In E. Coonan (Ed.), Teaching, not telling: Proceedings of the 2nd UK Information Literacy and Summon Day, Manchester Metropolitan University, 25 July 2013 (pp. 44–48). Retrieved from http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/13524/1/IL_and_summon_2014_proceedings.pdf
  211. Edwards, J. A., & Hill, V. (2014). What’s the name of the game? How Summon saves time for fun games. In E. Coonan (Ed.), Teaching, not telling: Proceedings of the 2nd UK Information Literacy and Summon Day, Manchester Metropolitan University, 25 July 2013 (pp. 12–19). Retrieved from http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/13524/1/IL_and_summon_2014_proceedings.pdf
  212. Einbrodt, M. (2014). The Primo graphical user interface (GUI) – critique and improvement suggestions. In IGeLU 2014 Conference Oxford. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/9.32-igelu-2014_meinbrodt_primo-gui.zip
  213. Ekkel, T., & Kaizer, J. (2007). AquaBrowser: Search and information discovery for libraries. Information Services and Use, 27(1-2), 79–83. Retrieved from http://iospress.metapress.com/content/r1252112544mq7vw/
  214. El-Den, JamalBui, LienNguyen, W. (2013). A Revised User Interface Design for the Discovery Search Tool “Summon”: A Case Study and Recommendations. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Management & Evaluation (pp. 9–9).
  215. Ellero, N. P. (2014). Exploring Library Discovery Positions: Are They Emerging or Converging? Journal of Web Librarianship, 8(4), 331–348. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2014.963778
  216. Ellero, N. P. (2013). An Unexpected Discovery: One Library’s Experience With Web-Scale Discovery Service (WSDS) Evaluation and Assessment. Journal of Library Administration, 53(5-6), 323–343. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2013.876824
  217. Ellero, N. P. (2013). Integration or Disintegration: Where Is Discovery Headed? Journal of Library Metadata, 13(4), 311–329. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2013.831277
  218. Elwell, B. (2013). Implementing Summon: an unexpected journey. Insights: The UKSG Journal, 26(2), 147–152. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.106
  219. Emanuel, J. (2009). Next Generation Catalogs: What Do They Do and Why Should We Care? Reference & User Services Quarterly, 49(2), 117–120. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/rusq.49n2.117
  220. Emanuel, J. (2011). Usability of the VuFind Next-Generation Online Catalog. Information Technology & Libraries, 30(1), 44–52. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v30i1.3044
  221. Enis, M. (2014). OCLC Introduces WorldCat Discovery Services. Library Journal. Retrieved from http://www.thedigitalshift.com/2014/01/discovery/oclc-introduces-worldcat-discovery-services/
  222. Enis, M. (2014). EBSCO Opens Metadata to Third-Party Discovery Services. Library Journal. Retrieved from http://www.thedigitalshift.com/2014/05/metadata/ebsco-opens-metadata-third-party-discovery-services/
  223. Erb, R. A. (2012). Encore Synergy Implementation at a Medium-Sized University Library: Unforeseen Challenges and Opportunities. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 515–534). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch030
  224. Evans, G., & Cleveland, S. (2008). Moody Blues: The Social Web, Tagging, and Nontextual Discovery Tools for Music. Music Reference Services Quarterly, 11(3-4), 177–201. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10588160802541210
  225. Evelhoch, Z. (2016). Web-Scale Discovery: Impact on Library Database Web Page Views and Usage. Journal of Web Librarianship, 1–13. http://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2016.1191048
  226. Exner, N., Bollinger, S., & Sims, I. (2012). Discovery in a Hurry: Fast Transitions from Federated Search to Article Discovery. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 351–365). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch020
  227. Fabbi, J. L. (2009). “Discovery” Focus as Impetus for Organizational Learning. Information Technology and Libraries, 28(4), 164–171. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v28i4.3227
  228. Fagan, J. C. (2012). Top 10 Discovery Tool Myths. Journal of Web Librarianship, 6(1), 1–4. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2012.651417
  229. Fagan, J. C. (2011). Discovery Tools and Information Literacy. Journal of Web Librarianship, 5(3), 171–178. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2011.598332
  230. Fagan, J. C. (2011). Federated Search Is Dead—and Good Riddance! Journal of Web Librarianship, 5(2), 77–79. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2011.573533
  231. Fagan, J. C., Mandernach, M. A., Nelson, C. S., Paulo, J. R., & Saunders, G. (2012). Usability Test Results for a Discovery Tool in an Academic Library. Information Technology and Libraries, 31(1), 83–112. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v31i1.1855
  232. Fagan, J., & Mandernach, M. (2011). Discovery by the Numbers: An Examination of the Impact of a Discovery Tool through Usage Statistics. In Charleston Conference Proceedings 2011 (pp. 570–582). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5703/1288284314967
  233. Fahey, S., Gordon, S., & Rose, C. (2011). Seeing Double at Memorial University: Two WorldCat Local Usability Studies. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 6(2), 14. Retrieved from https://journal.lib.uoguelph.ca/index.php/perj/article/view/1552/2282
  234. Faiks, A., Oberg, J., & Gabrio, K. (2012). WorldCat Local: A Transformative Solution. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 608–621). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch036
  235. Falciani-White, N. (2012). Understanding Information Seeking Behavior of Faculty and Students: A Review of the Literature. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 1–21). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch001
  236. Fawley, N., & Krysak, N. (Eds.). (2016). The Discovery Tool Cookbook: Recipes for Successful Lesson Plans. ALA Editions.
  237. Fawley, N., & Krysak, N. (2014). Learning to Love Your Discovery Tool: Strategies for Integrating a Discovery Tool in Face-To-Face, Synchronous, and Asynchronous Instruction. Public Services Quarterly, 10(4), 283–301. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2014.961110
  238. Fawley, N., & Krysak, N. (2012). Information Literacy Opportunities within the Discovery Tool Environment. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 19(2-4), 207–214. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2012.693439
  239. Fernandez, R. (2011). Ex Libris’s Primo: Easy To Implement, Intuitive To Use. Library Journal, 136(Reference Supplement), 17.
  240. Fifarek, A. (2007). The Birth of Catalog 2.0: Innovative Interfaces’ Encore Discovery Platform. Library Hi Tech News, 24(5), 13–15. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07419050710780353
  241. Fister, B. (2014). Redefining What Discovery Means. Library Journal. Retrieved from http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2014/10/opinion/peer-to-peer-review/redefining-what-discovery-means-peer-to-peer-review/
  242. Foley, D., & Hurley, T. (2014). MultiSearch comes to WIT libraries: Incorporating a discovery service into first-year learning support programme. SCONUL Focus, (61), 33–39. Retrieved from http://www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/10_12.pdf
  243. Foster, A. K., & MacDonald, J. B. (2013). A Tale of Two Discoveries: Comparing the Usability of Summon and EBSCO Discovery Service. Journal of Web Librarianship, 7(1), 1–19. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2013.757936
  244. Foster, A. K., & Williams, S. C. (2012). Early Adoption: EBSCO Discovery Service at Illinois State University. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 488–498). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch028
  245. Frances, M., Riccardi, S., Carlsen, C., & Dawson, A. (2010). Primo discovery and delivery of Fedora content. In The 5th International Conference on Open Repositories (OR2010), Madrid, Spain, 6-9 July 2010. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2390/biecoll-OR2010-59
  246. Franke, F., Groß, M., & Wawra, S. (2015). Der Discovery Service Primo im Bibliotheksverbund Bayern. Bibliotheksforum BSB, 9(4), 306–309. Retrieved from https://www.bibliotheksforum-bayern.de/fileadmin/archiv/2015-4/PDF-Einzelbeitraege/BFB_0415_16_Franke_V03.pdf
  247. Franke, F., & Groß, M. (2014). Was am Ende bleibt oder Als Tiger gesprungen… Die verbundweite Einführung des Discovery Service Primo im Bibliotheksverbund Bayern. In 103. Bibliothekartag, Bremen, 4. Juni 2014. Retrieved from http://www.opus-bayern.de/bib-info/volltexte/2014/1732/pdf/Franke_Gross_20140604.pdf
  248. Fransen, J., Friedman-Shedlov, L., Theis-Mahon, N., Traill, S., & Boudewyns, D. (2012). Setting a Direction for Discovery: A Phased Approach. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 174–193). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch011
  249. Frederiksen, L. (2015). Exploring Discovery. Public Services Quarterly, 11(1), 43–47. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2014.995861
  250. Freeman, D., Breeding, M., Heller, M., Silton, K., & Varnum, K. (2015). Web Scale Discovery Services [Video broadcast]. American Libraries Live. Retrieved from http://americanlibrarieslive.org/blog/archive-web-scale-discovery-services
  251. Freeman, D., Evans, G., Greene McDonald, C., & Smith, E. (2013). Making the Discovery Decision [Video broadcast]. American Libraries Live. Retrieved from http://americanlibrarieslive.org/blog/archive-making-discovery-decision
  252. Freivalds, D., & Lush, B. (2012). Thinking Inside the Grid: Selecting a Discovery System through the RFP Process. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 104–121). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch007
  253. Freund, L., Poehlmann, C., & Seale, C. (2012). From Metasearching to Discovery: The University of Florida Experience. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 22–43). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch002
  254. Frierson, E., & Virtue, A. (2013). Integrating Academic Library Services Directly Into Classroom Instruction Through Discovery Tools. Computers in Libraries, 33(7), 4–9.
  255. Fry, A. (2013). Technical Services Report: Discovery Systems: The Promise and the Reality. A Report of the RUSA MARS Local Systems & Services Program, American Library Association Annual Conference, Anaheim, June 2012. Technical Services Quarterly, 30(1), 99–107. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2013.735971
  256. Fu, P. (2015). Migration to Alma/Primo: A Case Study of Central Washington University. Chinese Librarianship, (40), 1–14. Retrieved from http://www.iclc.us/cliej/cl40FC.pdf
  257. Fyn, A. F., Lux, V., & Snyder, R. J. (2013). Reflections on teaching and tweaking a discovery layer. Reference Services Review, 41(1), 113–124. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00907321311300929
  258. Fu, L., & Thomes, C. (2014). Implementing discipline-specific searches in EBSCO Discovery Service. New Library World, 115(3/4), 102-115. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/NLW-01-2014-0003
  259. Gaffney, M. (2012). Interlibrary Loan Requests for Locally Available Materials: WorldCat Local’s Impact. College & Research Libraries, 73(1), 68–77. Retrieved from http://crl.acrl.org/content/73/1/68.abstract
  260. Gaines, D. J., & Fagan, J. C. (2015). OAIster on EBSCO Discovery Service, FirstSearch, and OAIster.worldcat.org. The Charleston Advisor, 16(4), 5–12. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5260/chara.16.4.5
  261. Gardner, T., & Inger, S. (2016). How Readers Discover Content in Scholarly Publications. Abingdon, UK: Renew Training. Retrieved from http://www.simoningerconsulting.com/nar/how_readers_discover.html
  262. Garrison, S., Prestamo, A., & Rodriguez, J. C. (2012). Putting Library Discovery Where Users Are. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 388–406). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch022
  263. Gavali, R. (2015). Discovery Service for Engineering and Technology Literature through Google Custom Search: A Case Study. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 35(6), 417–421. Retrieved from http://publications.drdo.gov.in/ojs/index.php/djlit/article/view/8825
  264. Gayhart, L., Khalid, B., & Belray, G. (2014). The Road to Responsive: University of Toronto Libraries’ Journey to a New Library Catalogue Interface. Code4Lib Journal, (23). Retrieved from http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/9195
  265. Geleijnse, H. (2011). Joint Forces or Forced Cooperation: Libraries and Library Networks at a Crossroads. Bibliothek Forschung Und Praxis, 35(2), 169–177. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bfup.2011.023
  266. Gewirtz, S. R., Novak, M., & Parsons, J. (2014). Evaluating the Intersection Between WorldCat Local and Student Research. Journal of Web Librarianship, 8(2), 113-124. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2014.877312
  267. Ghaphery, J., Owens, E., Coghill, D., Gariepy, L., Hodge, M., McNulty, T., & White, E. (2016). Building Bridges with Logs: Collaborative Conversations about Discovery across Library Departments. Code4Lib Journal, (32). Retrieved from http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/11355
  268. Goovaerts, M., Nieuwenhuysen, P., Dhamdhere, S., Smet, E. De, Dhamdhere, S. N., Kortekaas, S., & Noorden, R. Van. (2016). VLIR-UOS Workshop “E-Info Discovery and Management for Institutes in the South”: In E. de Smet & S. vDhamdhere (Eds.), E-Discovery Tools and Applications in Modern Libraries (pp. 1–40). IGI Global. http://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0474-0.ch001
  269. Graham, B., & Hagon, P. (2010). Making our catalogue as easy as 1, 2, 3. In VALA2010 Proceedings (pp. 1–25). Retrieved from http://www.vala.org.au/vala2010-proceedings/vala2010-session-1-graham
  270. Grant, C. (2015). Another perspective on ProQuest buying the Ex Libris Group. Thoughts from Carl Grant. Retrieved from http://thoughts.care-affiliates.com/2015/10/another-perspective-on-proquest-buying.html
  271. Graves, T., & Dresselhaus, A. (2012). One Academic Library—One Year of Web-scale Discovery. The Serials Librarian, 62(1-4), 169–175. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2012.652915
  272. Greene, C. (2012). The Long and Winding Road: Implementing Discovery at Indiana University Bloomington Libraries. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 499–514). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch029
  273. Greiner, T. (2011). How does switching to a discovery tool affect circulation? In ACRL 2011. Retrieved from https://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/events/national/2011/papers/how_does_switching.pdf
  274. Griffis, P., & Ford, C. (2009). Enhancing OPAC Records for Discovery. Information Technology and Libraries, 28(4), 191-193. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v28i4.3233
  275. Grindley, N. (2015). From where we are to where we want to be: The future of resource discovery from a UK perspective. In NISO Forum: The Future of Library Resource Discovery. Baltimore, Maryland. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/BaltimoreNISO/2015-niso-forum-the-future-of-library-resource-discovery-53603186
  276. Gross, J., & Sheridan, L. (2011). Web scale discovery: the user experience. New Library World, 112(5-6), 236–247. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03074801111136275
  277. Grotti, M. G., & Sobel, K. (2012). WorldCat Local and Information Literacy Instruction: An Exploration of Emerging Teaching Practice. Public Services Quarterly, 8(1), 12–25. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2011.563140
  278. Group, T. S. P. (2007). Summa White Paper Technical Section (p. 8). Retrieved from http://www.statsbiblioteket.dk/summa/summa_white_paper_technical.pdf
  279. Guthrie, A., & McCoy, R. (2012). A Glimpse at Discovery Tools within the HBCU Library Landscape. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 19(2-4), 297–311. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2012.693437
  280. Hadro, J. (2009). Serials solutions Debuts summon. Library Journal, 134(2), 23.
  281. Hagenbruch, A., & Heise, M. (2014). „suchen“ – ein Prototyp zum Vergleich von Discovery-Diensten. Bibliotheksdienst, 48(10), 816–827. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bd-2014-0099
  282. Hahn, S. (2013). Building a Better SLED! PNLA Quarterly, 78(1), 86–91. Retrieved from http://www.pnla.org/assets/documents/Quarterly/pnlaq78-1fall2013.pdf
  283. Hall, J., & Kucsak, M. (2014). Building the Next Successful Library Discovery Tool. In Discovery Tools Now and in the Future (18 November 2014). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unf.edu/library_facpub/31
  284. Hallyburton, A., & Marcus, E. (2012). Maximize Discovery and Minimize Cost. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 9(1), 1–12. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15424065.2012.651574
  285. Hamedinger, W., & Babitchev, V. (2010). Primo in Austria: maximising functionality and minimising individual efforts by resource sharing within a homogenous consortium. In IGeLU 2010 Conference Ghent. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/91_Hamedinger-Babitchev.pdf
  286. Han, M.-J. K., & Weathers, W. F. (2016). Know Thy Metadata: Metadata Challenges in Discovery Services. In K. Varnum (Ed.), Exploring Discovery: The Front Door to your Library’s Licensed and Digitized Content (pp. 267–276). Chicago, IL: ALA Editions.
  287. Han, M.-J. (2012). New Discovery Services and Library Bibliographic Control. Library Trends, 61(1), 162–172. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lib.2012.0025
  288. Hänger, C., Sabisch, A., & Lohrum, S. (2009). Consortial Primo Installation at KOBV, Germany. In IGeLU 2009 Conference Helsinki. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/consortial-primo-at-kobv.pdf
  289. Hannan, S., Heslip, S., & Johannes, K. (2016). Fixing Facets. In K. Varnum (Ed.), Exploring Discovery: The Front Door to your Library’s Licensed and Digitized Content (pp. 169–182). Chicago, IL: ALA Editions.
  290. Hanneke, R., & O’Brien, K. K. (2016). Comparison of three web-scale discovery services for health sciences research. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 104(2), 109–17. http://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.104.2.004
  291. Hanrath, S. (2014). Boolean Search Suggestions in Primo. In ELUNA 2014 Conference Montreal. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1808/13613
  292. Hanrath, S., & Kottmana, M. (2015). Use and Usability of a Discovery Tool in an Academic Library. Journal of Web Librarianship, 9(1), 1-21. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2014.983259
  293. Hanson, C., Hessel, H., Barneson, J., Boudewyns, D., Fransen, J., Friedman-Shedlov, L., … Traill, S. (2009). Discoverability Phase 1 Final Report (p. 160). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11299/48258
  294. Hanson, C., Hessel, H., Boudewyns, D., Fransen, J., Friedman-Shedlov, L., Hearn, S., … West, A. (2011). Discoverability Phase 2 Final Report (p. 76). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11299/99734
  295. Hardy, D., Reed, J., & Sadler, B. (2016). Geospatial Resource Discovery. In K. Varnum (Ed.), Exploring Discovery: The Front Door to your Library’s Licensed and Digitized Content (pp. 47–62). Chicago, IL: ALA Editions.
  296. Harmer, S. (2013). Enhancing Primo for users: viewing videos, indexing PDFs, displaying XML and more. In IGeLU 2013 Conference Berlin. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/5.31_Enhancing-Primo.pptx
  297. Harpel-Burke, P. (2012). Catalog Maintenance and Authority Control in Discovery Systems: A Survey of Early Adopters. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 469–486). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch027
  298. Harpel-Burke, P. (2012). Catalog Maintenance in the Discovery System: Opinions of Early Adopters. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 19(2-4), 246–263. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2012.693363
  299. Harris, S. (2011). Discovery services sift through expert resources. Research Information, 18–20. Retrieved from http://www.researchinformation.info/features/feature.php?feature_id=315
  300. Hartman-Caverly, S., Knapp, C., LaMagna, M., & Perzchowski, R. (2013). Using Qualitative Assessment Protocols to Evaluate a New Library Discovery Service. Computers in Libraries, 33(8), 5–9.
  301. Hatop, G. (2013). Integrating Linked Data into Discovery. Code4Lib Journal, 21. Retrieved from http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/8526
  302. Hawkins, D. T. (2016). Don’s Conference Notes: The Future of Discovery: A NISO Forum. Against the Grain, 27(6), 67–69.
  303. Hawkins, D. T. (2015). The Next Generation of Discovery Services: Where Are They Headed? — An NFAIS Workshop. Against the Grain, 27(1), 81–84. Retrieved from http://www.against-the-grain.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/dons_notes_v27-1.pdf
  304. Heller, M., & Ma, H. (2016). Collaborative Growth toward Discovery: Becoming Stronger through Change. In K. Varnum (Ed.), Exploring Discovery: The Front Door to your Library’s Licensed and Digitized Content (pp. 3–14). Chicago, IL: ALA Editions.
  305. Helling, W. (2015). Are You Experienced? Exploring User Experience in Public Libraries Discovery Systems… to the Rescue? Going Beyond your ILS-Based OPAC. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/WilliamHelling/3-discoverysystems-46642504
  306. Henry, R. L. (2015). Moving from Theory to Practice: Incorporating Feminist Approaches into Search and Discovery Tool Development. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(4), 514–516. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.06.020
  307. Herbertsson, L.-H., Widigson, M., Johansson, R., & Kovanen, L. (2015). Recycling Database Records. In 2014 Charleston Library Conference. Purdue University. Purdue e-Pubs. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/charleston/2014/Tech/6/
  308. Herm, K., & Volz, S. (2008). The Library Search Engine: A Smart Solution for Integrating Resources Beyond Library Holdings. Code4Lib Journal, 4. Retrieved from http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/142
  309. Hessel, H., & Fransen, J. (2012). Resource Discovery: Comparative Results on Two Catalog Interfaces. Information Technology and Libraries, 31(2), 21–44. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v31i2.2165
  310. Heyliger, S., McLoone, J., & Thomas, N. L. (2016). Moving Toward “Mega-choice”: The Evolution of Access Technologies in Special Collections. BM: A Journal of Rare Books, Manuscripts, and Cultural Heritage, 17(1), 17–31. Retrieved from http://rbm.acrl.org/content/17/1/17
  311. Hienert, D., Sawitzki, F., & Mayr, P. (2015). Digital Library Research in Action: Supporting Information Retrieval in Sowiport. D-Lib Magazine, 21(3/4). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1045/march2015-hienert
  312. Hill, J. S. (2008). Is it worth it? Management issues related to database quality. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 46(1), 5–26. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639370802182885
  313. Hilpert, W., Kahl, A., Luber, J., & Strasser, K. (2014). OPACplus + Discovery Service: Integration eines Discovery-Service mit Trefferlisten- Reitern in den OPACplus. Bibliotheksforum Bayern, 8(2), 142–143. Retrieved from http://www.bibliotheksforum-bayern.de/fileadmin/archiv/2014-2/PDF-Einzelbeitraege/BFB_0214_16_Kahl-etal_V04.pdf
  314. Ho, B., Kelley, K., & Garrison, S. (2009). Implementing VuFind as an alternative to Voyager’s WebVoyage interface: One library’s experience. Library Hi Tech, 27(1), 82–92. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07378830910942946
  315. Hodge, T., & MacDonald, J. R. (2013). Relevance and Phrase Searching in Summon: looking under the hood. Code4Lib Journal, 21. Retrieved from http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/8352
  316. Hoeppner, A. (2014). Analyze This: Usage and Your Collection — COUNTER: Basic Explanations to Disabuse Expectations. Against The Grain, 26(1), 74–76.
  317. Hoeppner, A. (2012). The Ins and Outs of Evaluating Web-Scale Discovery Services. Computers in Libraries, 32(3). Retrieved from http://www.infotoday.com/cilmag/apr12/Hoeppner-Web-Scale-Discovery-Services.shtml
  318. Hoeppner, A. (2011). Discovering Choices: The Web Scale Discovery Marketplace. In Electronic Resources & Libraries 2011. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/ERL2011-WSD
  319. Hofmann, A., & Wiermann, B. (2015). The VuFind Based “MT-Katalog”: A Customized Music Library Service at the University of Music and Drama Leipzig. In B. Lausen, S. Krolak-Schwerdt, & M. Böhmer (Eds.), Data Science, Learning by Latent Structures, and Knowledge Discovery (pp. 547–556). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44983-7_48
  320. Hofmann, A., & Wiermann, B. (2014). Customizing Music Discovery Services: Experiences at the Hochschule für Musik und Theater, Leipzig. Music Reference Services Quarterly, 17(2), 61–75. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10588167.2014.904699
  321. Hofmann, M. A., & Yang, S. Q. (2011). How Next-Gen R U? A Review of Academic OPACS in the United States and Canada. Computers in Libraries, 31(6), 26–29. Retrieved from http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/infotoday/access/2394758291.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT:PAGE&type=current&date=Jul/Aug+2011&author=Melissa+A+Hofmann;Sharon+Q+Yang&pub=Computers+in+Libraries&edition=&startpage=26&desc=How+Next-Gen+R+U?
  322. Hofmann, M. A., & Yang, S. Q. (2012). “Discovering” what’s changed: A revisit of the OPACs of 260 academic libraries. Library Hi Tech, 30(2), 253–274. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07378831211239942
  323. Holden, J. (2013). Charting Discovery. Against The Grain, 25(4), 1, continued on p. 14.
  324. Holderman, S., & Crockett, A. (2014). What Implementing a Discovery Tool Really Means. Tennessee Libraries, 64(2). Retrieved from http://www.tnla.org/?page=TL64_2_discovery
  325. Holman, L., Darraj, E., Glaser, J., Hom, A., Mathieson, H., Nettles, D., & Waller, A. (2012). How Users Approach Discovery Tools. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 252–267). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch014
  326. Homol, L. (2014). Web-based Citation Management Tools: Comparing the Accuracy of Their Electronic Journal Citations. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(6), 552–557. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.09.011
  327. Hooper, L. (2012). ExLibris’s Primo and Musical Research. Music Reference Services Quarterly, 15(2), 119–124. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10588167.2012.672088
  328. Hoover, J. (2016). Remaining discoverable: Video collections in EDS. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 28(1), 36–41. http://doi.org/10.1080/1941126X.2016.1130457
  329. Hosburgh, N. (2016). Approaching Discovery as Part of a Library Service Platform: Lessons Learned. In K. Varnum (Ed.), Exploring Discovery: The Front Door to your Library’s Licensed and Digitized Content (pp. 15–25). Chicago, IL: ALA Editions.
  330. Hoseth, A. (2012). Criteria to Consider when Evaluating Web-based Discovery Tools. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 90–103). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch006
  331. Houser, J. (2009). The VuFind implementation at Villanova University. Library Hi Tech, 27(1), 93–105. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07378830910942955
  332. Howard, D., & Wiebrands, C. (2011). Culture Shock: Librarians’ Response to Web Scale Search. In 2011 ALIA Information Online Conference, Australian Library and Information Association, Sydney, N.S.W. Sydney, N.S.W. Retrieved from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworks/6206/
  333. Hoy, M. B. (2012). An Introduction to Web Scale Discovery Systems. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 31(3), 323–9. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2012.698186
  334. Hubbard, J. (2015). Search@UW (Primo-Alma) Usability Testing Materials. UWM Libraries Other Staff Publications. Retrieved from http://dc.uwm.edu/lib_staffart/5
  335. Hudson, C., & Hukill, G. (2016). One-to-Many: Building a Single-Search Interface for Disparate Resources. In K. Varnum (Ed.), Exploring Discovery: The Front Door to your Library’s Licensed and Digitized Content (pp. 141–153). Chicago, IL: ALA Editions.
  336. Huffman, N. (2011). More than Just Linking: Integrating MARC and EAD in a Single Discovery Interface at Duke, UNC-Chapel Hill, and NCSU. Journal for the Society of North Carolina Archivists, 8(2), 2–17. Retrieved from http://voyager.pba.edu/library/docs/Huffman.pdf
  337. Iino, K. (2014). How the Summon web-scale discovery service enhances user experience and what challenges are to be addressed at the Bukkyo University Library. Journal of Information Processing and Management, 57(2), 99–108. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1241/johokanri.57.99
  338. Iino, K. (2014). How to use Web APi. Practical use of Web APIs for Library Web Services: a Case Study of Bukkyo University Library. (English). Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho No Kagaku to Gijutsu, 64(5), 181-187.
  339. Ipri, T., Yunkin, M., & Brown, J. M. (2009). Usability as a Method for Assessing Discovery. Information Technology & Libraries, 28(4), 181–183. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v28i4.3229
  340. Jackson, A. S., Comerford, K., Schadl, S. M., & Lubas, R. (2012). Discovering Our Library’s Resources: Vendor Tools Versus In-House Tools. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 338–350). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch019
  341. James, D., Garrett, M., & Krevit, L. (2009). Discovering discovery tools: Evaluating vendors and implementing Web 2.0 environments. Library Hi Tech, 27(2), 268-276. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07378830910968218
  342. Jansen, H. (2014). Discovery-Services – Einführung, Marktübersicht und Trends. Bibliotheksdienst, 48(10), 773–783. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bd-2014-0095
  343. Jansen, H., Kemner-Heek, K., & Schweitzer, R. (2011). Konkurrenzanalyse ausgewählter kommerzieller Suchindizes. In MALIS Praxisprojekte 2011?: Projektberichte aus dem berufsbegleitenden Masterstudiengang Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft der Fachhochschule Köln (pp. 139–158). Wiesbaden: Dinges & Frick. Retrieved from http://publiscologne.fh-koeln.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/400
  344. Jantzi, L., Richard, J., & Wong, S. (2016). Managing Discovery and Linking Services. The Serials Librarian, 70(1–4), 184–197. http://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2016.1153331
  345. Janyk, R. (2014). Augmenting discovery data and analytics to enhance library services. Insights, 27(3), 262–268. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.166
  346. Jarrett, K. (2012). Findit@Flinders: User Experiences of the Primo Discovery Search Solution. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 43(4), 278–299. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2012.10722288
  347. Jenks, H. (2008). Utilising tools for discovery. In VALA2008 Proceedings (pp. 1–13). Retrieved from http://www.vala.org.au/vala2008-proceedings/vala2008-session-9-jenks
  348. Jing, J., Lin, Q., Sharifi, A., & Swartz, M. (2015). Making User Rights Clear: Adding e-resource License Information in Library Systems. Code4Lib Journal, (29). Retrieved from http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/10724
  349. Jisc. (2011). Discovery – A metadata ecology for UK education & research [website]. Retrieved January 06, 2014, from http://discovery.ac.uk
  350. Joc, K., & Chang, K. (2010). The impact of discovery platforms on the information seeking behaviour of ESL undergraduate students. In VALA2010 Proceedings (pp. 1–22). Retrieved from http://www.vala.org.au/vala2010-proceedings/vala2010-session-1-joc
  351. Johnson, G. (2009). Anywhere, anytime, any device: Primo for a Consortium. In IGeLU 2009 Conference Helsinki. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/primo-for-consortium.pdf
  352. Johnson, M. (2013). Usability Test Results for Encore in an Academic Library. Information Technology and Libraries, 32(3), 59–86. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v32i3.4635
  353. Johns-Smith, S. (2012). Evaluation and Implementation of a Discovery Tool. In Kansas Library Association College and University Libraries Section Proceedings (pp. 17–23). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4148/culs.v2i0.1612
  354. Johnston, E., & Walton, G. (2014). Summon, information literacy and “Step Up To HE.” In E. Coonan (Ed.), Teaching, not telling: Proceedings of the 2nd UK Information Literacy and Summon Day, Manchester Metropolitan University, 25 July 2013 (pp. 20–28). Retrieved from http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/13524/1/IL_and_summon_2014_proceedings.pdf
  355. Johnston, N., Salaz, A., & O’Connell, R. (2013). Determining Usability of VuFind for Users in the United Arab Emirates. Code4Lib Journal, 19. Retrieved from http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/7880
  356. Joint, N. (2010). The one-stop shop search engine: a transformational library technology?: ANTAEUS. Library Review, 59(4), 240–248. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00242531011038550
  357. Joint, N. (2008). SUPrimo at the University of Strathclyde. In IGeLU 2008 Conference Madrid. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/17a_joint.pdf
  358. Jonckheere, F. (2014). Genèse et développement dans un cadre consortium d’un projet portail documentaire. In Primo dans un contexte consortial. Paris: Association des Clients d’Ex Libris France (ACEF). Retrieved from http://acefexlibrisfr.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/upe_presentation_acef_v2-2014.pdf
  359. Jones, A. (2014). Plan, Practice, Participate: Tips for Libraries Considering Implementation of EBSCO Discovery Service. South Carolina Libraries, 1(1), 1–3. Retrieved from http://scholarcommons.sc.edu/scl_journal/vol1/iss1/9
  360. Jones, S. L., & Thorpe, A. (2014). Library Homepage Design at Medium-Sized Institutions. Journal of Web Librarianship, 8(1), 1–22. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2014.850315
  361. Jost, C. (2014, October). Bibliothèque?: bien choisir son discovery tool. Archimag (278), 29-32.
  362. Jubb, M., Look, H., & Sparks, S. (2007). Researchers’ use and perceptions of discovery services. Learned Publishing, 20(2), 147–153(7). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/174148507X185126
  363. Kabashi, A., Peterson, C., & Prather, T. (2014). Discovery Services: a white paper for the Texas State Library & Archives Commission (p. 35). Retrieved from https://www.tsl.texas.gov/sites/default/files/public/tslac/lot/TSLAC_WP_discovery__final_TSLAC_20140912.pdf
  364. Kabashi, A., Peterson, C., & Prather, T. (2014). An Executive Summary of “Discovery Services: A White Paper for the Texas State Library & Archives Commission”. Texas Library Journal, 90(4), 10–12.
  365. Kain, M. M. (2015). Discovery, a New Way of Searching (Thinking): The Challenges, Trials, and Tribulations. In 2014 Charleston Library Conference. Purdue University. Purdue e-Pubs. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/charleston/2014/Users/7/
  366. Kaiser, A. (2016). Vor-Ort-Auskunft im digitalen Wandel. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Philosophische Fakultät I, Institut für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft. Retrieved from http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/docviews/abstract.php?id=42600
  367. Kaluza, H. (2013). Google Scholar versus EBSCO Discovery Service?: ein vergleichender Retrieval-Test. In MALIS Praxisprojekte 2013?: Projektberichte aus dem berufsbegleitenden Masterstudiengang Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft der Fachhochschule Köln (pp. 59–79). Wiesbaden: Dinges & Frick. Retrieved from http://publiscologne.fh-koeln.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/372
  368. Katarzyna, M. (2014). Faceted navigation in search and discovery tools. In W. Babik (Ed.), Knowledge Organization in the 21st Century: Between Historical Patterns and Future Prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014 Kraków, Poland (pp. 405–412). Würzburg: Ergon Verlag.
  369. Katz, D., LeVan, R., & Ziso, Y. (2011). Using Authority Data in VuFind. Code4Lib Journal, 11. Retrieved from http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/5354
  370. Kaufmann, K., Larsen, J., & DeSalvo, P. (2012). Discovering the Discovery Tool: The Introduction and Impact on Research and Instruction at Seminole State College of Florida. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 19(2-4), 278–296. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2012.693432
  371. Keene, C. (2011). Discovery services: next generation of searching scholarly information. Serials, 24(2), 193-196. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1629/24193
  372. Kelley, M. (2012). Stakeholders Strive to Define Standards for Web-Scale Discovery Systems. Library Journal. Retrieved from http://www.thedigitalshift.com/2012/10/discovery/coming-into-focus-web-scale-discovery-services-face-growing-need-for-best-practices/
  373. Kelly, M. (2012). Web-scale discovery services face growing need for best practices. Library Journal, October 15, 34–40.
  374. Kemp, J. (2012). Does Web-Scale Discovery Make a Difference?: Changes in Collections Use after Implementing Summon. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 456–468). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch026
  375. Kemperman, S. S., Brembeck, B., Brown, E. W., de Lange-van Oosten, A., Fons, T., Giffi, C., … White, J. (2014). Success Strategies for Electronic Content Discovery and Access: A Cross-Industry White Paper (p. 21). Retrieved from http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/reports/data-quality/215233-SuccessStrategies.pdf
  376. Kennedy, R., & Crump, M. (2012). Simplifying the search experience: resisting the lure of shiny, new technology. In IGeLU 2012 Conference Zurich. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/igelu2012-RKMC_Ronan_Kennedy-Show.ppsx
  377. Kennedy, S. P. (2014). Uncovering Discovery Layer Services. Public Services Quarterly, 10(1), 54–61. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2014.875788
  378. Kenney, B. (2011). Liverpool’s discovery: A university library applies a new search tool to improve the user experience. Library Journal, 136(3), 24–27.
  379. Kerico, J., Anthony, P., Bulock, C., & Fields, L. (2012). Fostering Discovery through Web Interface Design: Perpetual Beta as the New Norm. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 288–302). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch016
  380. Kerstens, V. (2014). Limo for the LIBIS Network. In Primo dans un contexte consortial. Paris: Association des Clients d’Ex Libris France (ACEF). Retrieved from http://acefexlibrisfr.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/2013-01-27-limo-in-consortium-vk.pdf
  381. Ketterman, E., & Inman, M. E. (2014). Discovery Tool vs. PubMed: A Health Sciences Literature Comparison Analysis. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 11(3), 115–123. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15424065.2014.938999
  382. Ketterman, E., Besaw, M. E., & Tucker, M. (2011, May 17). Rethinking How Patrons Discover Information: Implementing a Discovery Tool. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10342/3506
  383. Khokhar, M. (2012). Bodleian Libraries authentication system: dual sign-on from Primo. In IGeLU 2012 Conference Zurich. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/auth_igelu12_masud-khokar.pptx
  384. Khokhar, M., & Isherwood, A. (2012). Primom: a mobile interface for Primo. In IGeLU 2012 Conference Zurich. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/9.31-D.-7.1-Masud-K.-mobile_igelu12.pptx
  385. Kidder, T. L. M. (2016). Exploring Discovery at Rosenberg Library: What Happens when a Library, a Museum, and an Archive Get Together to Share a Single Discovery Tool? In K. Varnum (Ed.), Exploring Discovery: The Front Door to your Library’s Licensed and Digitized Content (pp. 35–43). Chicago, IL: ALA Editions.
  386. Klein, M. B. (2010). Hacking Summon. Code4Lib Journal, (11). Retrieved from http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/3655
  387. Knitel, M. (2011). Die konsortiale Primo-Instanz der OBVSG im Überblick. Mitteilungen Der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen & Bibliothekare, 64(2), 192–195. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10760/16255
  388. Knitel, M., Labner, J., & Oberhauser, O. (2010). Sachliche Erschliessung und die neue Suchmaschine des Österreichischen Bibliothekenverbundes. B.I.T.online – Zeitschrift Für Bibliothek, Information Und Technologie, 13(3), 275–285. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10760/14966
  389. Kohila, G. T., & Elavazhagan, K. (2015). Empowering libraries with discovery tools. Indian Journal of Science, 21(72), 195–200. Retrieved from http://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:ijs2&volume=21&issue=72&article=005
  390. Kohl-Frey, O. (2014). Die Öffnung der digitalen Magazinbibliothek?: Entwicklungen an der Universität Konstanz zwischen Summon und Hybrid Bookshelf. Bibliotheksdienst, 48(10), 807–815. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bd-2014-0098
  391. Kohl-Frey, O. (2012). Make the Library look more like Google?: Die Einführung eines Discovery-Systems an der Universität Konstanz. B.I.T. Online, 15(3), 247–250. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-193723
  392. Kolín, A. (2016). Využívanost discovery systému Summon v Národní lékařské knihovně – naše dvouleté zkušenosti s provozem služby. In MEDSOFT 2016 (pp. 71–77). Retrieved from http://www.creativeconnections.cz/medsoft/2016/Medsoft_2016_Kolin.pdf
  393. Koot, G.-J. (2015). The Art Discovery Group Catalogue: a new and freely-available tool for art historical bibliographic research. Art Libraries Journal, 40(3), 41–48.
  394. Kornblau, A. I., Strudwick, J., & Miller, W. (2012). How Web-Scale Discovery Changes the Conversation: The Questions Librarians Should Ask Themselves. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 19(2-4), 144–162. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2012.693443
  395. Kortekaas, S., & Kramer, B. (2014). Thinking the unthinkable – doing away with the library catalogue. Insights, 27(3), 244–248. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.174
  396. Kostädt, P. (2014). Eine Einführung in die Welt der Discovery Services. ProLibris, 19(3), 104–108. Retrieved from http://www.bibliotheken-nrw.de/fileadmin/Dateien/Daten/ProLibris/ProLibris-3-14-Webansicht.pdf
  397. Kostädt, P. (2012). Einsatz und Nutzung des EBSCO Discovery Service in der Universitäts- und Stadtbibliothek Köln. ABI Technik, 32(3), 122-127. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/abitech-2012-0025
  398. Koster, L. (2014). Relevance redefined. In IGeLU 2014 Conference Oxford. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/lukask/relevance-redefined
  399. Koster, L. (2012). Discovery tools: a rearguard action? In ELAG 2012. European Library Automation Group. Retrieved from http://fr.slideshare.net/lukask/discovery-tools-a-rearguard-action
  400. Koster, L. (2012). Wizards and Tables or how the Primo back office could work better. In IGeLU 2012 Conference Zurich. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Wizards-and-Tables_Koster.ppsx
  401. Koster, L., & Ritze, D. (2013). The drawbridge to knowledge – Linking scholarly publications and research information in Primo. In IGeLU 2013 Conference Berlin. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/11.52_The-Drawbridge-to-Knowledge.pptx
  402. Kronenfeld, M. R., & Bright, H. S. (2015). Library resource discovery. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 103(4), 210–213. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.4.011
  403. Lafferty, S., & Ruthven, T. (2012). Using the Primo webservice in a mobile app. In IGeLU 2012 Conference Zurich. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/UNSW-IGeLU-2012_Susan_Lafferty.pptx
  404. Lagace, N. (2014). Standards Update NISO Releases Recommendations from the Open Discovery Initiative: Promoting Transparency in Discovery Working Group. Serials Review. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2014.978244
  405. LaGuardia, C. (2014). Hurrah! For Discovery and for Transparency in Discovery. Library Journal. Retrieved from http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2014/08/opinion/not-dead-yet/hurrah-for-discovery-and-for-transparency-in-discovery-not-dead-yet/#_
  406. Lam, M.-Y. S., & Sum, M.-K. (2013). Enhancing Access and Usage: the OUHK’s Experience in Resource Discovery Service. In IFLA WLIC 2013 – Singapore – Future Libraries: Infinite Possibilities (pp. 1–10). IFLA. Retrieved from http://library.ifla.org/id/eprint/76
  407. Land, A. (2014). Meeting the discovery challenge: user expectations, usability and Primo. In IGeLU 2014 Conference Oxford. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/9.31-University-of-Manchester-IGeLU-presentation-2014.pdf
  408. Larose, K., & Preater, A. (2015). UX at Imperial: a case study of qualitative approaches to Primo usability studies. In IGeLU 2015 Conference Budapest. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/5.02-UX-at-Imperial.pptx
  409. Larsen, T. (2009). The Library Catalog as Experimental Sandbox. OLA Quarterly, 15(1), 10–12. Retrieved from http://www.olaweb.org/assets/documents/olaq_15no1.pdf
  410. Latham, M., & Ewen, M. (2014). Discovering Summon. SCONUL Focus, (61), 51–52. Retrieved from http://www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/15_16.pdf
  411. Leonard, T. (2014). Information skills at UCO using Summon. In E. Coonan (Ed.), Teaching, not telling: Proceedings of the 2nd UK Information Literacy and Summon Day, Manchester Metropolitan University, 25 July 2013 (pp. 35–37). Retrieved from http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/13524/1/IL_and_summon_2014_proceedings.pdf
  412. Le Nezet, R. (2013). Les outils de découverte : apports et prospective. Arabesques, 70, 10–11. Retrieved from http://www.abes.fr/Arabesques/Arabesques-n-70
  413. Lee, B., & Chung, E. (2016). An Analysis of Web-scale Discovery Services From the Perspective of User’s Relevance Judgment. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.06.016
  414. Lee, W. (2010). Primo v.2 and v.3 experience at Yonsei University. In IGeLU 2010 Conference Ghent. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/1012_Lee.pdf
  415. Leebaw, D., Conlan, B., Gonnerman, K., Johnston, S., & Sinkler-Miller, C. (2013). Improving Library Resource Discovery: Exploring the Possibilities of VuFind and Web-Scale Discovery. Journal of Web Librarianship, 7(2), 154–189. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2013.785825
  416. Leodolter, U. (2013). Primo in Austria – 4 years of operation. In IGeLU 2013 Conference Berlin. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/14_4_LeodolterIGeLU2013.ppt
  417. Levine-Clark, M., & Price, J. S. (2015). Where Do We Go From Here? Assessing the Value and Impact of Discovery Systems. In NISO Forum: The Future of Library Resource Discovery. Baltimore, Maryland. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/BaltimoreNISO/2015-niso-forum-the-future-of-library-resource-discovery-53562956
  418. Levine-Clark, M. (2014). Access to Everything: Building the Future Academic Library Collection. Portal: Libraries & the Academy, 14(3), 425-437. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/pla.2014.0015
  419. Levine-Clark, M., McDonald, J., & Price, J. S. (2014). The effect of discovery systems on online journal usage: a longitudinal study. Insights, 27(3), 249–256. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.153
  420. Levine-Clark, M., Price, J., & McDonald, J. (2014). Discovery or Displacement? A Large-Scale Longitudinal Study of the Effect of Discovery Systems on Online Journal Usage. In B. R. Bernhardt, L. H. Hinds, & K. P. Strauch (Eds.), Charleston Library Conference (pp. 9–16). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5703/1288284315331
  421. Lewis, N. (2008). Implementing Ex Libris’s Primo at the University of East Anglia. Ariadne, 55(55), (Online). Retrieved from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue55/lewis/
  422. Li, C. (2013). Thinking Out of the Box: Receiving a Grant to Fund Our Discovery Tool. Georgia Library Quarterly, 50(3), 12–14.
  423. Li, H., & Cruickshank, D. (2015). Digital Libraries: Providing Quality Information. In R. B. Allen, J. Hunter, & M. L. Zeng (Eds.), Digital Libraries: Providing Quality Information: 17th International Conference on Asia-Pacific Digital Libraries, ICADL 2015, Seoul, Korea, December 9-12, 2015. Proceedings (Vol. 9469, pp. 153–157). Springer International Publishing. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27974-9_15
  424. Library users reject new online catalog – old one returning. (2015). Los Altos Town Crier. Los Altos. Retrieved from http://www.losaltosonline.com/news/sections/news/199-city-affairs/50850-library-users-reject-new-online-catalog-old-one-returning
  425. Locey, B., Judkins, T., & Neville, S. (2011). Staff vs public data views in Primo – how we have used Primo to protect our confidential data, and share our public data. In IGeLU 2011 Conference Haifa. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Staff-vs-Public-Data-views.pdf
  426. Lohrum, S. (2013). Managing Primo on Large Scale. In IGeLU 2013 Conference Berlin. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/14-52-Lohrum-IGELU-2013-Primo.pdf
  427. Lovins, D. (2016). From User Stories to Working Code: A Case Study from NYU’s Digital Collections Discovery Initiative. In K. Varnum (Ed.), Exploring Discovery: The Front Door to your Library’s Licensed and Digitized Content (pp. 203–217). Chicago, IL: ALA Editions.
  428. Lown, C., & Boyer, J. (2013). How Users Search the Library from a Single Search Box. College & Research Libraries, 73(1). Retrieved from http://crl.acrl.org/content/early/2012/01/09/crl-321
  429. Luca, H. (2011). KonSearch Usability Study: evaluation of the new literature search engine of the University of Konstanz (p. 1-99). Retrieved from http://kops.ub.uni-konstanz.de/handle/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-191980
  430. Luca, H. (2011). Usability-Studie zu KonSearch: Evaluation der neuen Literatursuchmaschine der Universität Konstanz (pp. 1–86). Retrieved from http://kops.ub.uni-konstanz.de/handle/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-168427
  431. Lukesch, R. (2015). Das Discovery System Primo im OBV – Integration und Kooperation. In 32. Österreichischer Bibliothekartag in Wien 2015. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:0290-opus4-21636
  432. Lundrigan, C., Manuel, K., & Yan, M. (2015). “Pretty Rad”: Explorations in User Satisfaction with a Discovery Layer at Ryerson University. College & Research Libraries, 76(1), 43-62. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/crl.76.1.43
  433. Lustig, J. (2011). Web-Scale Discovery Services (p. 21). Burlingame, CA. Retrieved from http://www.outsellinc.com/store/products/1023
  434. Lute, J. (2014). Expanding Primo beyond your ILS data source including EAD and graphic sources. In IGeLU 2014 Conference Oxford. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/11.3-Expanding-Primo-beyond-your-ILS-data-source-including-EAD-and-graphic-sources.pptx
  435. Luther, J., & Kelly, M. C. (2011). The next generation of Disco. Library Journal, 136(5), 66–71. Retrieved from http://discoverytools.jimdo.com/app/download/8220432894/Luther+Judy%2C+Kelly+Maureen.pdf?t=1372093839
  436. Lützenkirchen, F., & Falkenstein-Feldhoff, K. (2014). Seit Ende 2012 nutzt die UB Duisburg-Essen Primo inklusive Primo Central. ProLibris, 19(3), 116–119. Retrieved from http://www.bibliotheken-nrw.de/fileadmin/Dateien/Daten/ProLibris/ProLibris-3-14-Webansicht.pdf
  437. Machovec, G. (2010). From Your Managing Editor: Journal Discovery Tools. The Charleston Advisor, 12(1), 3–3. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5260/chara.12.1.3a
  438. Madsen, C., & Hurst, M. (2015). Resource Discovery @ The University of Oxford. Retrieved from http://www.athenaeum21.com/#!Resource-Discovery-The-University-of-Oxford/gi8ew/566f19d40cf274f69811e877
  439. Magnan, D., Duffy, C., & Mackes, R. T. (2015). Implementing a Discovery Tool in a Hospital Library: A Tale of Two Success Stories. Journal of Hospital Librarianship, 15(4), 435–443. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15323269.2015.1079767
  440. Mahoney, J., & Leach-Murray, S. (2012). Implementation of a Discovery Layer: The Franklin College Experience. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 19(2-4), 327–343. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2012.693435
  441. Maisonneuve, M. (2008). Dix bonnes raisons de choisir un opac de nouvelle génération. Documentaliste- Sciences de L’information, 45(3), 16–17. Retrieved from http://www.toscaconsultants.fr/articles/10bonnesraisons.pdf
  442. Maisonneuve, M. (2008). Le catalogue de la bibliothèque à l’heure du web 2.0 : étude des opacs de nouvelle génération (p. 305). Paris: A.D.B.S. Editions.
  443. Majors, R. (2012). Comparative user experiences of next-generation catalogue interfaces. Library Trends, 61(1), 186–207. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lib.2012.0029
  444. Majors, R., & Mantz, S. L. (2011). Moving to the patron’s beat. OCLC Systems and Services, 27(4), 275–283. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10650751111182588
  445. Majors, R., McCullough, J., & Randall, K. M. (2012). Inventing the Can Opener: Getting the Most Out of Discovery. The Serials Librarian, 62(1-4), 222–226. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2012.652926
  446. Mandernach, M. A., & Fagan, J. C. (2012). Creating Organizational Buy-in: Overcoming Challenges to a Library-Wide Discovery Tool Implementation. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 419–437). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch024
  447. Manifold, A. (2016). Discovery Platforms and the Database of Record. In K. Varnum (Ed.), Exploring Discovery: The Front Door to your Library’s Licensed and Digitized Content (pp. 257–266). Chicago, IL: ALA Editions.
  448. Mann, T. (2008). The Changing Nature of the Catalog and Its Integration with Other Discovery Tools. Final Report: March 17, 2006. Prepared for the Library of Congress by Karen Calhoun. A Critical Review. Journal of Library Metadata, 8(2), 169–197. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10911360802087374
  449. Manuel, K., & Thomas, D. (2014). Summon Now and Then: Student Satisfaction Two Years On. In TRY Library Staff Conference 2014, St. Michael’s College in the University of Toronto, May 6, 2014. Retrieved from http://library.ryerson.ca/wp-content/uploads/STUDENT_SATISFACTION.pdf
  450. Marcin, S., & Morris, P. (2008). OPAC: The Next Generation: Placing an Encore Front End Onto a SirsiDynix ILS. Computers in Libraries, 28(5), 6–12. Retrieved from http://www.iii.com/news/reprints/EncoreWithSirsiDynix.pdf
  451. Marcum, J. W. (2001). From information center to discovery system: Next step for libraries? Journal of Academic Librarianship, 27(2), 97–106. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(00)00181-6
  452. Masters, R. (2009). Using Primo for searching Archives and Manuscripts: challenges and an approach. In IGeLU 2009 Conference Helsinki. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/primo-searching-archives-and-manuscripts.pdf
  453. McCullough, J., O’Brien, L., & Varner, S. (2016). Abstracts from Conference Proceedings [Serials Access Then, Now and How: Moving From FirstSearch to WorldCat Discovery]. The Serials Librarian, 70(1–4), 361–362. http://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2016.1170512
  454. McKay, D. (2011). Gotta keep ’em separated: the single search box may not be right for libraries. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the New Zealand Chapter of the ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction (CHINZ 2011), Hamilton, New Zealand, 04-05 July 2011 (pp. 109–112). ACM. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2000756.2000772
  455. McManamon, C. (2015). Learning from observation: end user reaction to the Summon discovery service. Insights: The UKSG Journal, 28(1), 64–68. Retrieved from http://insights.uksg.org/article/download/uksg.176/417
  456. Meadow, K., & Meadow, J. (2012). Search Query Quality and Web-Scale Discovery: A Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 19(2-4), 163–175. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2012.693434
  457. Medeiros, N. (2009). Researching the research process: Information-seeking behavior, Summon, and Google Books. OCLC Systems Services, 25(3), 153–155. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10650750910982520
  458. Meerburg, G. (2014). Analysing Primo journal coverage as a tool for optimising our information resources collection. In IGeLU 2014 Conference Oxford. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/14-42-Meerburg.pptx
  459. Meredith, W. (2013). Web-Scale Search and Virtual Reference Service: How Summon Is Impacting Reference Question Complexity and Reference Service Delivery. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 18(1), 1–13. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2013.803005
  460. Metz-Wiseman, M., Griffin, M., Borchert, C. A., & Henry, D. (2012). Best Practices for Selecting the Best Fit. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 77–89). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch005
  461. Michel, S. (2009). Reflections from Menucha. OLA Quarterly, 15(1), 13–16. Retrieved from http://www.olaweb.org/assets/documents/olaq_15no1.pdf
  462. Milberg, C. I. (2012). A Tale of Two Systems: A Case Study on the Implementation of Two Discovery Systems at Davidson College. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 19(2-4), 264–277. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2012.693339
  463. Miller, A. (2014). In it together: selection and implementation of Alma/Primo as a consortial system. In IGeLU 2014 Conference Oxford. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/14.2-In-it-Together.pptx
  464. Mills, K. (2014). What do students want from library discovery tools? In Internet Librarian 2014. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/mirya/ili14-library-futures-what-do-students-want-from-discovery-tools-slideshare
  465. Minsenti, P. (2012). Il Discovery services librarian al servizio della biblioteca accademica di ricerca. In Oltre la biblioteca e i bibliotecari: professioni necessarie per la biblioteca accademica di ricerca. Roma. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10760/17955
  466. Minsenti, P. (2013). Il discovery services librarian. AIB Studi, 53(1), 75–83.
  467. Mintz, M. (2012). Introducing Discovery Systems to Academic User Communities: A Case Study with Recommendations. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 438–455). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch025
  468. Mischo, W. H., Schlembach, M. C., Bishoff, J., & German, E. M. (2012). User Search Activities within an Academic Library Gateway: Implications for Web-scale Discovery Systems. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 153–173). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch010
  469. Mitchell, E., West, B., & Johns-Masten, K. (2015). Revitalizing Library Services with Usability Data: Testing 1, 2, 3… Computers in Libraries, 35(4), 11–14. Retrieved from http://www.infotoday.com/cilmag/may15/Mitchell-West-Johns-Masten–Revitalizing-Library-Services-With-Usability-Data.shtml
  470. Mitchell, S. (2006). Machine-assisted Metadata Generation and New Resource Discovery: Software and Services. First Monday, 11(8). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v11i8.1384
  471. Moen, W. E., & Murray, K. R. (2002). Designing and Demonstrating a Resource Discovery Service for the Library of Texas. Texas Library Journal, 78(3), 101–106. Retrieved from http://voyager.pba.edu/library/docs/Moen.pdf
  472. Moffatt, S. (2014). Deep search or harvest? How we decided. In IGeLU 2014 Conference Oxford. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/14_5-Deep-Search-or-Harvest-How-we-decided.pdf
  473. Moore, K. B., & Greene, C. (2012). Choosing Discovery: A Literature Review on the Selection and Evaluation of Discovery Layers. Journal of Web Librarianship, 6(3), 145–163. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2012.689602
  474. Moore, M. (2016). But is My Resource Included? How to Manage, Develop, and Think about the Content in Your Discovery Tool. The Serials Librarian, 70(1–4), 149–157. http://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2016.1147877
  475. Morgan, E. L. (2009). “Next-Generation” Library Catalogs. In IOLUG Meeting. Retrieved from http://infomotions.com/musings/ngc4purdue/
  476. Morse, L., Conrad, L., Gilstrap, D., Chen, B., Kessler, R., Gindi, M. (Michelle), & D’Agnostino, A. (2015). NISO Working Group Connections LIVE! Collaborative Improvements: ODI Success Stories (January 28, 2015). Retrieved from http://fr.slideshare.net/BaltimoreNISO/open-discovery-initiative-successes-january-28-2015
  477. Morse, L., & Stohn, C. (2014). One System, Different Expectations: The User at the Center of Discovery. In 2014 Charleston Library Conference. Charleston, SC. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed_code/41726193
  478. Mortimore, J. M., Dunn, L. M., McNaughton, D. A., Novicki, E., Wade, E. J., & Whittington, C. A. (2012). Smoke Gets in Your Eyes: Trials and Triumphs of Implementing the Ex Libris Primo Discovery Service in a Small Regional Consortium. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 19(2-4), 344–366. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2012.693344
  479. Moulaison, H. L., Kroeger, A., & Corrado, E. M. (2015). What’s Driving Discovery Systems? The Case for Standards. In IFLA WLIC 2015 Cape Town (pp. 1–9). Cape Town, South Africa: IFLA. Retrieved from http://library.ifla.org/1300/1/166-moulaison-en.pdf
  480. Munn, A. (2015). Moving the library systems at the University of Westminster to a hosted service. SCONUL Focus, (63), 2–5. Retrieved from http://www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/2 Munn.pdf
  481. Music Library Association’s Emerging Technologies and Services Committee. (2012). Music Discovery Requirements (p. 42). Middleton, WI. Retrieved from http://committees.musiclibraryassoc.org/uploads/ETSC/MDRdocument.pdf
  482. Mussell, J., & Croft, R. (2013). Discovery Layers and the Distance Student: Online Search Habits of Students. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 7(1-2), 18–39. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2012.705561
  483. Musser, L. R., & Coopey, B. M. (2016). Impact of a Discovery System on Interlibrary Loan. College & Research Libraries, 77(5), 643–653. http://doi.org/10.5860/crl.77.5.643
  484. Mutschler, T. (2014). VuFind als Discovery-Tool für digitalisierte Kulturgüter. ABI Technik, 34(2), 66-74. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/abitech-2014-0012
  485. Namei, E., & Young, C. A. (2015). Measuring Our Relevancy: Comparing Results in a Web-Scale Discovery Tool, Google & Google Scholar. In ACRL 2015 Proceedings – March 25–28, 2015, Portland, Oregon (pp. 522–535). Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/confsandpreconfs/2015/Namei_Young.pdf
  486. Narayanan, N. (2015). Implementing Web Scale Discovery Services: special reference to Indian Libraries’ context. In G. Devarajan, K. C. Abdul Majeed, D. Koovakkai, P. K. S. Kumar, & S. Beena (Eds.), Blended Libraries and Information Centres: A Blueprint for the Development of Information Profession in India. Southern Bookstar. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2411.8245
  487. Narayanan, N., & Mukundan, R. (2014). Choice of Discovery: Evaluating Web Scale Discovery Services. In M. Bavakutty & T. A. Abdul Azeez (Eds.), Redefining Academic Libraries in the Knowledge Society. New Delhi: Ess Ess Publications. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3028.2723
  488. Natarajan, M., Antelman, K., Lynema, E., Pace, A. K., Breeding, M., Cassidy, E. D., … Hanscom, M. J. (2016). Exploring the E-Discovery Tools on the Use of Library Collections by Users. In E. de Smet & S. Dhamdhere (Eds.), E-Discovery Tools and Applications in Modern Libraries (pp. 122–137). IGI Global. http://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0474-0.ch007
  489. National Federation of Advanced Information Services. (2011). Web Scale Information Discovery: The Opportunity, the Reality, the Future. National Federation of Advanced Information Services (NFAIS). Retrieved from http://nfais.org/event?eventID=388
  490. National Federation of Advanced Information Services (NIFAIS). (n.d.). Survey Comparisons on Discovery Service Participation and Perceptions: 2010 and 2012 (p. 2). Retrieved from http://info.nfais.org/info/Survey_2010_2012_Comp.pdf
  491. National Federation of Advanced Information Services (NIFAIS). (2012). Draft Code of Practice: Discovery Services (p. 9). Retrieved from http://info.nfais.org/info/codedraft1312012.pdf
  492. National Information Standards Organization (NISO). Open Discovery Initiative Working Group. (2014). Open Discovery Initiative: Promoting Transparency in Discovery (NISO RP-19-2014). A Recommended Practice of the National Information Standards Organization (p. 38). Baltimore, MD: National Information Standards Organization. Retrieved from http://www.niso.org/apps/group_public/download.php/13388/rp-19-2014_ODI.pdf
  493. National Federation of Advanced Information Services (NIFAIS). (2013). Recommended Practices: Discovery Services (p. 12). Philadelphia, PA. Retrieved from http://info.nfais.org/info/Recommended_Practices_Final_Aug_2013.pdf
  494. National Information Standards Organization (NISO). (2013). ODI Survey Report: Reflections and Perspectives on Discovery Services (p. 28). Retrieved from http://www.niso.org/apps/group_public/document.php?document_id=9977&wg_abbrev=odi
  495. National Information Standards Organization (NISO). Open Discovery Initiative Working Group. (2013). Open Discovery Initiative: Promoting Transparency in Discovery (NISO RP-19-201x). A Recommended Practice of the National Information Standards Organization [Draft for public comment] (p. 26). Baltimore, MD. Retrieved from http://www.niso.org/apps/group_public/download.php/11606/rp-19-201x_ODI_draft_for_comments_final.pdf
  496. Naumann, A. (2014). Discovery Services in wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken : dargestellt am Beispiel von UBfind in der Universitätsbibliothek Magdeburg. Fachhochschule Köln. Retrieved from http://publiscologne.fh-koeln.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/507
  497. Naun, C. C. (2010). Next Generation OPACs: A Cataloging Viewpoint. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 48(4), 330–342. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639370903437709
  498. Nelson, D., & Turney, L. (2015). What’s in a word??: Rethinking facet headings in a discovery service. Information Technology and Libraries, 34(2), 76–91. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v34i2.5629
  499. Neubauer, W., & Piguet, A. (2009). The Knowledge Portal, or the vision of easy access to information. Library Hi Tech, 27(4), 594–601. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07378830911007691
  500. Neatrour, A., Cummings, R., & McIntyre, S. (2016). Regional Aggregation and Discovery of Digital Collections: The Mountain West Digital Library. In K. Varnum (Ed.), Exploring Discovery: The Front Door to your Library’s Licensed and Digitized Content (pp. 219–232). Chicago, IL: ALA Editions.
  501. Neuwirth, E., & Harrison, G. (2013). Beyond the Single Search Box: A New Opportunity to Scale Library Services (and promote the value of the library through discovery). Against The Grain, 25(4), 20–26.
  502. Newcomer, N. L. (2011). The Detail Behind Web-Scale: Selecting and Configuring Web-Scale Discovery Tools to Meet Music Information Retrieval Needs. Music Reference Services Quarterly, 14(3), 131–145. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10588167.2011.596098
  503. Ng, A. (2014). Enhancing Chinese word normalization in Primo with the HKIUG TSVCC mapping table. In IGeLU 2014 Conference Oxford. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/4.42-alanng.pdf
  504. Ng, A. (2013). Integrating Primo and Millennium via OVP. In IGeLU 2013 Conference Berlin. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/14.32_alanng.pdf
  505. Nichols, A., Billey, A., Spitzform, P., Stokes, A., & Tran, C. (2014). Kicking the Tires: A Usability Study of the Primo Discovery Tool. Journal of Web Librarianship, 1–24. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2014.903133
  506. Niu, X., Zhang, T., & Chen, H. (2014). Study of User Search Activities with Two Discovery Tools at an Academic Library. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 30(5), 422-433. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2013.873281
  507. Noe, D. E. (2012). Replicating Top Users’ Searches in Summon and Google Scholar. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 225–249). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch013
  508. North, M. (2015). Deep Searching, Interoperability, and more Digital Collections. In IGeLU 2015 Conference Budapest. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/11.03-North.pptx
  509. North, M. (2014). Next Step: Digital collections into Primo. In IGeLU 2014 Conference Oxford. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/IGeLU2014-NUPrimo-NextStepDigital-MichaelNorth.ppsx
  510. North, M. (2013). Primo at Northwestern – Story of Local Development. In IGeLU 2013 Conference Berlin. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/5_4_NU_Primo-Story_of_Development-IGeLU-2013-MASTER-2.pptx
  511. Notess, G. R. (2011). Deciphering Discovery. Online, 35, 45–47.
  512. Oefelein, T. (2016). Global discovery trends and the library’s changing role. Research Informationormation. Retrieved from https://www.researchinformation.info/news/analysis-opinion/global-discovery-trends-and-librarys-changing-role?news_id=2133
  513. O’Hara, L. (2012). Collection Usage Pre- and Post-Summon Implementation at the University of Manitoba Libraries. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 7(4), 25–34. Retrieved from https://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/12166
  514. O’Hara, L., Nicholls, P., & Keiller, K. (2012). Search Success at the University of Manitoba Libraries Pre- and Post-Summon Implementation. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 268–287). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch015
  515. Oldham, R. (2014). Hacking Your Discovery Layer. In Computers in Libraries 2014. Retrieved from http://conferences.infotoday.com/documents/194/A105_Oldham.pptx
  516. Olmedo Granados, G. (2016). Primo vs. Summon: una comparación desde la experiencia. In XIII Jornadas de la Asociación de Usuarios de productos de Ex Libris en España (Expania). Santiago de Compostela. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10261/132609
  517. Osborne, H. M., & Cox, A. (2014). An Investigation Into The Perceptions Of Academic Librarians And Students Towards Next-Generation Opacs And Their Features. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 49(1). Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/PROG-10-2013-0055
  518. Ours, M. G. (2012). The Evaluation of Discovery Services at Lynchburg College: 2009-2010. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 19(2-4), 387–397. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2012.695676
  519. Owen, W., & Michalak, S. C. (2015). Engine Of Innovation: Building the High Performance Catalog. Information Technology and Libraries, 34(2), 5–18. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v34i2.5702
  520. Palmisano, J. (2012). The Single-Search Project: Selecting and Implementing Primo at a Research and Cultural Heritage Institution. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 544–561). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch032
  521. Palsson, F. (2012). Usability Testing Summon on the USC Libraries Home Page. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 303–318). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch017
  522. Parry, M. (2014). As Researchers Turn to Google, Libraries Navigate the Messy World of Discovery Tools. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/As-Researchers-Turn-to-Google/146081/
  523. Pattern, D. (2014). Riding the Gartner Hype Cycle. In E. Coonan (Ed.), Teaching, not telling: Proceedings of the 2nd UK Information Literacy and Summon Day, Manchester Metropolitan University, 25 July 2013 (pp. 2–4). Retrieved from http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/13524/1/IL_and_summon_2014_proceedings.pdf
  524. Perrin, J. M., Clark, M., De-Leon, E., & Edgar, L. (2014). Usability Testing for Greater Impact: A Primo Case Study. Information Technology and Libraries, 33(4), 57–66. Retrieved from http://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/ital/article/view/5174
  525. Perry, M. (2014). Revitalizing a Lesson: Teaching With a Discovery Tool. Online Searcher, Jan/Feb, 38–41. Retrieved from http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/infotoday/doc/1500950340.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT:PAGE&type=current&date=Jan/Feb+2014&author=Perry,+Maureen&pub=Online+Searcher&edition=&startpage=38-41&desc=Revitalizing+a+Lesson:+Teaching+With+a+Discovery+Tool
  526. Petr, J., & Currie, L. (2015). How Do Librarians Prefer to Access Collections? In 2014 Charleston Library Conference. Purdue University. Purdue e-Pubs. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/charleston/2014/Users/10/
  527. Philip, M. (2010). Do students want a One-stop-shop to help them navigate their way around the maze of library resources? A Usability Study looking at the beta version of Summon, the new library search engine at the University of Huddersfield. University of Sheffield. Retrieved from http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/9824/
  528. Pienimäki, A. (2014). The Best of both worlds or the end of the world as we know It? – A usability approach to the cross-product cross-ideology discovery interface Finna. In IGeLU 2014 Conference Oxford. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/11-51-TheBestofBothWorlds.pptx
  529. Pinkas, M. M., Baglivo, M. Del, Klein, I. R., Brown, E., Harris, R., & Gerhart, B. (2014). Selecting and Implementing a Discovery Tool: The University of Maryland Health Sciences and Human Services Library Experience. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 11(1), 1–12. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15424065.2013.876574
  530. Pipp, E., Knitel, M., Mayer, W., & Putz, M. (2011). Bericht der AG Primo-Implementierung an die Vollversammlung des österreichischen Bibliothekenverbundes zum möglichen Einsatz des Dienstes Primo Central. Mitteilungen Der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen & Bibliothekare, 64(2), 196–214. Retrieved from http://www.univie.ac.at/voeb/fileadmin/Dateien/Publikationen/VOB-Mitteilungen/vm6420012_Inhaltsverzeichnis.pdf
  531. Polidoro, P. (2015). Using Qualitative Methods to Analyze Online Catalog Interfaces. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 53(3-4), 314–330. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2015.1013235
  532. Popistasu, R. (2013). Linked Data: From ALEPH/PRIMO to the Dictionary of Luxembourgish Authors and back. In IGeLU 2013 Conference Berlin. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/14.21-Roxana-Popistasu-Linked-data.pps
  533. Popowich, S. (2016). Agile Open-Source Discovery: Blacklight with EBSCO Discovery Service. In K. Varnum (Ed.), Exploring Discovery: The Front Door to your Library’s Licensed and Digitized Content (pp. 73–82). Chicago, IL: ALA Editions.
  534. Popp, M. P., & Dallis, D. (Eds.). (2012). Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (p. 754). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3
  535. Powers, A., Todorinova, L., Fox, S., Hoeppner, A., Page, M., Kasprowski, R., … Waltner, R. (2012). Discover EDS: Tales of Implementation and Use. In Charleston Conference Proceedings 2012 (pp. 247–246). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5703/1288284315108
  536. Poulter, D. (2012). Primo Central: A Step Closer to Library Electronic Resource Discovery. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 535–543). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch031
  537. Prommann, M., & Zhang, T. (2015). Applying Hierarchical Task Analysis Method to Discovery Layer Evaluation. Information Technology & Libraries, 34(1), 77–105. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v34i1.5600
  538. Quilliam, J. (2014). Discovery, services and integrations with Alma and Primo APIs. In IGeLU 2014 Conference Oxford. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/14.61-Discovery-services-and-integrations-with-Alma-and-Primo-APIs_JennyQuilliam.pptx
  539. Quint, B. (2010). The Undiscovered Discovery. Information Today, July/Augus. Retrieved from http://www.infotoday.com/IT/jul10/Quint.shtml
  540. Quitzsch, N. (2014). Vorbei die Zeiten von Gebrauchsanweisungen für Bibliotheksportale: Nutzerbeteiligung und Co-Design am Beispiel des neuen KOBV-Portals. Bibliotheksdienst, 48(10), 795–806. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bd-2014-0097
  541. Race, T. M. (2012). Resource Discovery Tools: Supporting Serendipity. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 139–152). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch009
  542. Rädler, K. (2011). Neues Suchportal mit Aquabrowser in der Vorarlberger Landesbibliothek. Mitteilungen Der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen & Bibliothekare, 64(2), 219–223. Retrieved from https://fedora.phaidra.univie.ac.at/fedora/get/o:103633/bdef:Content/get
  543. Rahman, M. M., Shoeb, M. Z. H., Ansari, M. A., Balas, J. L., Chickering, F. W., Yang, S. Q., … Ebenezer, C. (2016). Embracing E-Resource Discovery Technique Using Open Source Software: In E. de Smet & S. Dhamdhere (Eds.), E-Discovery Tools and Applications in Modern Libraries (pp. 138–167). IGI Global. http://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0474-0.ch008
  544. Raicher, E. (2010). Prima Primo?! Mitteilungen Der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen & Bibliothekare, 63(3/4), 85–89. Retrieved from http://www.univie.ac.at/voeb/fileadmin/Dateien/Publikationen/VOB-Mitteilungen/vm63201023_4.pdf
  545. Raicher, E. (2010). Möglichkeiten und Grenzen von Primo bei der Einführung in deutschsprachigen Bibliotheken und Bibliotheksverbünden. University of Applied Sciences Burgenland (Austria). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10760/14865
  546. Raieli, R. (2015). Vecchi paradigmi e nuove interfacce: la ricerca di un equilibrato sviluppo degli strumenti di mediazione dell’informazione (Prima parte). AIB studi, 55(1). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2426/aibstudi-11084
  547. Raieli, R. (2015). Vecchi paradigmi e nuove interfacce: la ricerca di un equilibrato sviluppo degli strumenti di mediazione dell’informazione (Seconda parte). AIB studi, 55(2). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2426/aibstudi-11200
  548. Raieli, R. (2014). Instant, cultural and infinite?: lo sviluppo dei sistemi di ricerca e scoperta verso le qualità del pensiero (note da FSR 2014). AIB studi, 54(1), 95–114. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2426/aibstudi-9991
  549. Ramsay, M., & Chamberlain, E. (2012). Software Selection Methodology for Library Discovery Layer Systems. Retrieved from https://foss4lib.org/decision-support/discovery-layer-ssm
  550. Rapp, D. (2012). Discovery at Dartmouth. Library Journal, 137, 36–39.
  551. Rasche, M., & Böhme, M. (2014). „One Slot” für die Kunden der Stadtbücherei Münster. ProLibris, 19(3), 122–123. Retrieved from http://www.bibliotheken-nrw.de/fileadmin/Dateien/Daten/ProLibris/ProLibris-3-14-Webansicht.pdf
  552. Reh, U., & Steenweg, H. (2012). Der lange Weg von HeBIS zum Discovery Service. In 101. Deutscher Bibliothekartag in Hamburg 2012. Hamburg. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:0290-opus-13144
  553. Reidsma, M. (2016). Algorithmic Bias in Library Discovery Systems. Retrieved from https://matthew.reidsrow.com/articles/173
  554. Rele, S. (2016). So … What Do Librarians Really Think About Our Discovery Tool? Retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/shilparele/2/
  555. Renaville, F. (2016). Open Access and Discovery Tools: How do Primo Libraries Manage Green Open Access Collections? In K. Varnum (Ed.), Exploring Discovery: The Front Door to your Library’s Licensed and Digitized Content (pp. 233–256). Chicago, IL: ALA Editions. Retrieved from http://orbi.ulg.ac.be/handle/2268/185329
  556. Renaville, F. (2015). D’un Primo en local à un Primo dans le cloud: deux déploiements en deux ans d’une solution discovery à l’Université de Liège. In ANF Documentation Mathématique 2015 : Les bibliothèques mathématiques de demain. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2268/188168
  557. Renaville, F., & Richelle, L. (2013). Déploiement de la solution discovery Primo à l’Université de Liège. Cahiers de La Documentation = Bladen Voor Documentatie, (4), 41–53. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2268/160646
  558. Renaville, F., Richelle, L., & Thirion, P. (2013). “Where are my Marc records?” – Librarians’ perception of discovery tools. In IGeLU 2013 Conference Berlin. Berlin. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2268/154833
  559. Riccardi, S., Lafferty, S., Ruthven, T., & Harmer, S. (2011). Using Primo to discover e-research repositories. In IGeLU 2011 Conference Haifa. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/UNSW-IGELU2011-presentation.pdf
  560. Richardson, H. A. H. (2013). Revelations From the Literature: How Web-Scale Discovery Has Already Changed Us. Computers in Libraries, 33(4). Retrieved from http://www.infotoday.com/cilmag/may13/Richardson–How-Web-Scale-Discovery-Has-Already-Changed-Us.shtml
  561. Ritze, D. (2012). Primo and the Semantic Web. In IGeLU 2012 Conference Zurich. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/DataEnrichment_Dominique_Ritze.ppt
  562. Robinson, L., Snyder, R., & Burke, D. (2013). Discovery and Analysis of the World’s Research Collections: JSTOR and Summon Under the Hood. The Serials Librarian, 64(1-4), 196–199. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2013.760317
  563. Rochkind, J. (2013). A Comparison of Article Search APIs via Blinded Experiment and Developer Review. Code4Lib Journal, 19. Retrieved from http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/7738
  564. Rodríguez Bravo, B. (2015). Information Searching Using Discovery Tools and OPACs. Strengths and Weaknesses. In 2015 IFLA Annual Meeting/World Library Information Congress. Cape Town, South Africa: IFLA. Retrieved from http://library.ifla.org/1154/2/141-rodriquez-en.pdf
  565. Rodríguez-Bravo, B., & Travieso-Rodríguez, C. (2014). Catálogos de nueva generación en las bibliotecas universitarias españolas. Una primera exploración. In I Congresso ISKO Espanha e Portugal / XI Congreso ISKO España (Ed.), Informação e/ou Conhecimento: as duas faces de Jano (pp. 864–878). Porto: Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto -. Retrieved from http://www.youblisher.com/p/749221-I-Congresso-ISKO-Espanha-e-Portugal-XI-Congreso-ISKO-Espana/
  566. Rodríguez Bravo, B., Travieso Rodríguez, C., Simões, M. G. de M., & Freitas, M. C. V. de. (2014). Evaluating discovery tools in Portuguese and Spanish academic libraries. In W. Babik (Ed.), Knowledge Organization in the 21st Century: Between Historical Patterns and Future Prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014 Kraków, Poland (pp. 516–523). Würzburg: Ergon Verlag. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10174/11782
  567. Roseckë, V., & Žabicka, P. (2013). Požadavky na vëménu dat mezi knihovním a discovery systémem na príkladu implementace systému VuFind v Moravské zemské knihovng. Knihovna, 24(1), 79–88.
  568. Rose-Wiles, L. M., & Hofmann, M. A. (2013). Still Desperately Seeking Citations: Undergraduate Research in the Age of Web-Scale Discovery. Journal of Library Administration, 53(2-3), 147–166. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2013.853493
  569. Rowe, R. (2010). Web-Scale Discovery: A Review of Summon, EBSCO Discovery Service, and WorldCat Local. The Charleston Advisor, 12(1), 5–10. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5260/chara.12.1.5
  570. Rowe, R. (2011). Encore Synergy, Primo Central. The Charleston Advisor, 12(4), 11–15. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5260/chara.12.4.11
  571. Ruthven, T. (2010). Where users look: implications for information delivery through Primo. In IGeLU 2010 Conference Ghent. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/94_ruthven.pdf
  572. Ruthven, T. (2009). Primo at UNSW: search first and beyond. In IGeLU 2009 Conference Helsinki. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/primo-unsw.pdf
  573. Sabisch, A., Lennard, H., & Surkau, M. (2011). Testing the new library portal | Primo (FU Berlin) – a combined approach of expert and user evaluation for assessing its usability. In IGeLU 2011 Conference Haifa. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/9-4-2-Sabisch-et-al-Primo-Usability.pdf
  574. Sadeh, T. (2015). From Search to Discovery. Bibliothek Forschung Und Praxis, 39(2), 212–224. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bfp-2015-0028
  575. Sadeh, T. (2013). From search to discovery. In IFLA WLIC 2013 – Singapore – Future Libraries: Infinite Possibilities (pp. 1–17). IFLA. Retrieved from http://library.ifla.org/id/eprint/104
  576. Sadeh, T. (2008). User experience in the library: a case study. New Library World, 109(1/2), 7–24. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03074800810845976
  577. Sadeh, T. (2007). Time for a change: new approaches for a new generation of library users. New Library World, 108(7/8), 307–316. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03074800710763608
  578. Sadler, B. (2009). Blacklight as a unified discovery platform. In Code4Lib 2009. Retrieved from http://code4lib.org/conference/2009/sadler
  579. Sadler, B., & Bourg, C. (2015). Feminism and the Future of Library Discovery. Code4Lib Journal, (28). Retrieved from http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/10425
  580. Safley, E. (2008). Discovering the Library: Finding the Hidden Barriers to Success Using the Catalog. In 2008 IATUL PROCEEDINGS. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul/2008/papers/27/
  581. Safley, E., Montgomery, D., & Gardner, S. (2011). Oasis or Quicksand: Implementing a Catalog Discovery Layer to Maximize Access to Electronic Resources. The Serials Librarian, 60(1-4), 164–168. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2011.556028
  582. Sanches, T. (2016). Improving Research and Learning in Higher Education in Portugal: Digital Resources, E-Books, and a Discovery System as Enabling Factors for Students. Journal of Web Librarianship. http://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2016.1207583
  583. Santos Bento, F. M., & de Jesus Oliveira, L. (2014). Pesquisa 4.0: novas dinâmicas de pesquisa e descoberta de informação científica e cooperação entre investigadores. Perspectivas Em Ciência Da Informação, 19(2), 4-14. Retrieved from http://portaldeperiodicos.eci.ufmg.br/index.php/pci/article/view/1831
  584. Sapon-White, R. (2009). Legacy Metadata and the New Catalog. OLA Quarterly, 15(1), 28–30. Retrieved from http://www.olaweb.org/assets/documents/olaq_15no1.pdf
  585. Sarifah, A. (2014). Discovery Service as One Stop Information Services. Retrieved from http://www.cais.unimas.my/media/media/pkma/Seminar/Seminar2014/S2P3.pdf
  586. Scardilli, B. (2016). ILS Product Roundup: Choosing Among the Top Discovery Services. Computers in Libraries, 36(2), 34–38. Retrieved from http://www.infotoday.com/cilmag/mar16/Scardilli–ILS-Product-Roundup.shtml
  587. Schaffner, V. (2011). FRBR in MAB2 und Primo – ein kafkaesker Prozess? Möglichkeiten der FRBRisierung von MAB2-Datensätzen in Primo, exemplarisch dargestellt an Datensätzen zu Franz Kafkas “Der Process.” Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10760/16193
  588. Schaffner, V. (2012). FRBR in MAB2 und Primo – ein kafkaesker Prozess? Möglichkeiten der FRBRisierung von MAB2-Datensätzen in Primo, exemplarisch dargestellt an Datensätzen zu Franz Kafkas “Der Process” (p. 104). Graz: Wolfgang Neugebauer Verlag GesmbH.
  589. Schiller, R. (2011). „Kuugeln“ [sprich: „Kuhg(e)ln] statt „goo­geln“ [sprich: „guhg(e)ln] – Integrierte Suche mit EBSCO Discovery Service im Medienbestand der Universitätsbibliothek der Kunstuniversität Graz. Mitteilungen Der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen & Bibliothekare, 64(2), 215–218. Retrieved from https://fedora.phaidra.univie.ac.at/fedora/get/o:103633/bdef:Content/get
  590. Schoblasky, L., & Mather, A. (2014). Searching for Primary Sources: An Introduction to Using Special Collections Discovery Tools. In A. Bahde, H. Smedberg, & M. Taormina (Eds.), Using primary sources: hands-on instructional exercises (pp. 129–133). ABC-CLIO.
  591. Schonfeld, R. C. (2016). Barriers to Discovery of and Access to the Scientific Literature in the Corporate Sector. New York, NY. http://dx.doi.org/10.18665/sr.283028
  592. Schonfeld, R. C. (2015). What Are the Larger Implications of ProQuest’s Acquisition of Ex Libris? Libraries & Scholarly Communication. Retrieved from http://www.sr.ithaka.org/blog/what-are-the-larger-implications-of-proquests-acquisition-of-exlibris/
  593. Schonfeld, R. C. (2014). Does Discovery Still Happen in the Library? Roles and Strategies for a Shifting Reality (p. 12). Retrieved from http://www.sr.ithaka.org/sites/default/files/files/SR_Briefing_Discovery_20140924_0.pdf
  594. Schonfeld, R. (2011). Libraries’ Strategic Stewardship of their Users’ Discovery Experience. Against the Grain, 23(2), 46–47. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/atg/vol23/iss2/16
  595. Schottlaender, B. E. C. (2002). The New Academic Platform: Beyond Resource Discovery. Journal of Internet Cataloging, 5(3), 27–32. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J141v05n03_02
  596. Seaman, G. (2012). Adapting VuFind as a Front-end to a Commercial Discovery System. Ariadne. Retrieved from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue68/seaman
  597. Seeber, K. P. (2015). Teaching “format as a process” in an era of Web-scale discovery. Reference Services Review, 43(1), 19–30. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/RSR-07-2014-0023
  598. Seeliger, F. (2015). A Tool for Systematic Visualization of Controlled Descriptors and Their Relation to Others as a Rich Context for a Discovery System. In IFLA WLIC 2015 Cape Town (p. 4). Retrieved from http://library.ifla.org/1227/1/141-seeliger-en.pdf
  599. Sellés-Carot, A., & Serrano-Cobos, J. (2011). Del opac extendido a la biblioteca expandida: al fin una realidad. El Profesional de La Informacion, 20(4), 460–464. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2011.jul.15
  600. Shadle, S., & Davis, S. (2016). Wrangling Cats: A Case Study of a Library Consortium Migration. The Serials Librarian, 70(1–4), 116–120. http://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2016.1148421
  601. Shapiro, S. D. (2014). Discovery Tools as Electronic Billboards to Market your Library. Library Hi Tech News, 31(10). Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/LHTN-07-2014-0062?journalCode=lhtn
  602. Shapiro, S. D. (2013). We are all aggregators (and publishers) now: how discovery tools empower libraries. Library Hi Tech News, 30(7), 7–9. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-07-2013-0041
  603. Shen-Aridor, S. (2015). Challenges of Discovery Tools. In IGeLU 2015 Conference Budapest. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/10.21Challenges-of-Discovery-Tools.ppsx
  604. Shi, X., & Levy, S. (2015). An Empirical Review of Library Discovery Tools. Journal of Service Science and Management, 8, 716–7125. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2015.85073
  605. Sierra, T., Ryan, J., & Wust, M. (2007). Beyond OPAC 2.0: Library Catalog as Versatile Discovery Platform. Code4Lib Journal, (1). Retrieved from http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/10
  606. Silton, K. (2014). Assessment of Full-Text Linking in Summon: One Institution’s Approach. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 26(3), 163–169. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1941126X.2014.936767
  607. Sims, I. L., & Walker, S. (2012). Implementing a Discovery Tool at Two HBCUs. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 19(2-4), 312–326. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2012.693370
  608. Slomovici, A., & Bruère, G. (2012). Le SCD de Tours et l’utilisation de ENCORE , l’outil d’Innovative Systems. In Journée d’étude Couperin Discovery tools. Paris. Retrieved from http://www.couperin.org/images/stories/Discovery_tools/encore_scd_tours_anne_slomovici.pdf
  609. Snyder, T. (2010). Music Materials in a Faceted Catalog: Interviews with Faculty and Graduate Students. Music Reference Services Quarterly, 13(3-4), 66–95. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10588167.2010.528746
  610. Somerville, M. A., Schader, B. J., & Sack, J. R. (2012). Improving the discoverability of scholarly content in the twenty-first century: collaboration opportunities for librarians, publishers, and vendors. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/SomervilleSage
  611. Somerville, M. M. (2013). Summon web-scale discovery service implementation: An organizational readiness case study. Computers in Libraries, 33(6), 22–26. Retrieved from http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/infotoday/doc/1433942039.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT:PAGE&type=current&date=Jul%2FAug+2013&author=Somerville%2C+Mary+M&pub=Computers+in+Libraries&edition=&startpage=22-26&desc=Summon+Web-Scale+Discovery+Service+Implementation%3A+An+Organizational+Readiness+Case+Study
  612. Somerville, M. M. (2013). Digital Age Discoverability: A Collaborative Organizational Approach. Serials Review, 39(4), 234–239. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2013.10.006
  613. Somerville, M. M., & Antelman, K. (2013). Organisational transformation paves way for improved discovery. Research Information, (66), 24–26. Retrieved from http://www.researchinformation.info/features/feature.php?feature_id=423
  614. Somerville, M. M., & Conrad., L. Y. (2013). Collaborative Improvements in the Discoverability of Scholarly Content Accomplishments, Aspirations, and Opportunities: A SAGE White Paper (p. 21). Retrieved from http://www.sagepub.com/repository/binaries/pdf/improvementsindiscoverability.pdf
  615. Soules, A., Golomb, L., Kelly, J. R., & Chen, B. (2014). Navigating the MLA Bibliography—Redux: Performance Across Vendor Platforms and Discovery Tools. Journal of Library Administration, 54(2), 107–126. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2014.903367
  616. Specht, A. (2014). ULB Bonn – Discovery Portal mit dem Index Summon und der Oberfläche VuFind. ProLibris, 19(3), 112–115. Retrieved from http://www.bibliotheken-nrw.de/fileadmin/Dateien/Daten/ProLibris/ProLibris-3-14-Webansicht.pdf
  617. Spencer, J. S., & Millson-Martula, C. (Eds.). (2014). Discovery Tools: The Next Generation of Library Research (p. 296). Routledge.
  618. Spezi, V., Creaser, C., & Conyers, A. (2015). The impact of RDS on usage of electronic content in UK academic libraries: selected results from a UKSG-funded project. Serials Review. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2015.1035991
  619. Spezi, V., Creaser, C., O’Brien, A., & Conyers, A. (2013). Impact of library discovery technologies: A report for UKSG (p. 79). Retrieved from http://www.uksg.org/sites/uksg.org/files/UKSG_final_report_16_12_13_by_LISU.pdf
  620. Spiteri, L. F. (Ed.). (2016). Managing Metadata in Web-scale Discovery Systems. Facet Publishing.
  621. Spiteri, L. F. (2012). Social discovery tools: extending the principle of user convenience. Journal of Documentation, 68(2), 206–217. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00220411211209195
  622. Starkweather, W., & Stowers, E. (2009). Smartphones: A Potential Discovery Tool. Information Technology and Libraries, 28(4), 187–188. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v28i4.3231
  623. Stevenson, K., Elsegood, S., Seaman, D., Pawlek, C., & Nielsen, M. P. (2009). Next-generation library catalogues: reviews of Encore, Primo, Summon and Summa. Serials: The Journal for the Serials Community, 22(1), 68–82. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1629/2268
  624. Stewart, M. (2008). Primo Implementation at the British Library. In IGeLU 2008 Conference Madrid. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/17a_stewart.pdf
  625. Stohn, C. (2015). How Do Users Search and Discover? – Findings from Ex Libris User Research. Retrieved from http://www.exlibrisgroup.com/category/UserStudiesWhitePaper
  626. Stone, G. (2016). Leveling the playing field: Why we need resource discovery tools. In Fiesole Collection Development Retreat, 6-8 April 2016, Fiesole (Florence), Italy. Fiesole. Retrieved from http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/26553/1/Stone_Fiesole_Discovery.pptx
  627. Stone, G. (2015). The benefits of resource discovery for publishers: a librarian’s view. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 106–113. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/20150204
  628. Stone, G. (2010). Research has never been so easy: Summon at the University of Huddersfield. In 5th UNICA Scholarly Communication Seminar: “Find it, Get it, Use it, Store it”, 7-9 November 2010, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal. Retrieved from http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/8918
  629. Stone, G. (2010). Searching life, the universe and everything? The implementation of Summon at the University of Huddersfield. Liber Quarterly, 20(1), 25–52. Retrieved from http://liber.library.uu.nl/index.php/lq/article/view/URN:NBN:NL:UI:10-1-113578
  630. Stuart, K., Varnum, K., & Ahronheim, J. (2015). Measuring Journal Linking Success from a Discovery Service. Information Technology & Libraries, 34(1), 52–76. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v34i1.5607
  631. Stühn, A. (2014). FHB Aachen, Köln und Münster entwickeln ihr Suchportal. ProLibris, 19(3), 109–111. Retrieved from http://www.bibliotheken-nrw.de/fileadmin/Dateien/Daten/ProLibris/ProLibris-3-14-Webansicht.pdf
  632. Sujatha, H. R., & Reddy, M. B. (2014). Web Scale Discovery Services/Tools: Transforming Access to Library Resources. Library Herald, 52(2), 99-108. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0976-2469.2014.00500.4
  633. Summann, F., Pietsch, C., & Pieper, D. (2013). The cloud in the local library catalogue?: an integrated local portal solution with seamless discovery service integration at Bielefeld University Library. In 102. Deutscher Bibliothekartag in Leipzig 2013. Leipzig. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:0290-opus-14686
  634. Sunckel, B., Reh, U., & Nienerza, H. (2014). Das HeBIS Discovery System: Kooperative Entwicklung einer neuen Rechercheoberfläche für HeBIS-Bibliotheken. Bibliotheksdienst, 48(10), 784–794. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bd-2014-0096
  635. Szott, S. (2012). Vom Prototypen zum nachhaltigen Hosting-Service: die Resource Discovery Lösung ALBERT. Bibliotheksdienst, 46(8-9), 683-686. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bd.2012.46.89.683
  636. Tam, W., Cox, A. M., & Bussey, A. (2009). Student user preferences for features of next-generation OPACs: A case study of University of Sheffield international students. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 43(4), 349–374. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00330330910998020
  637. Tang, C. (2015). Achieving the Ables: Reimagining the Digital Discovery Services at the National Library of Singapore. In IFLA WLIC 2015 Cape Town (p. 15). Cape Town, South Africa. Retrieved from http://library.ifla.org/1156/1/147-tang-en.pdf
  638. Tang Xiaoxin. (2014). PrimoMELINETS Ⅱ 元数据收割接口的设计和实现 [Primo Harvesting-interface Design and Implementation of MELINETS Ⅱ Metadata]. 现代图书情报技术 [New Technology of Library and Information Service], 30(2), 99–104. Retrieved from http://www.infotech.ac.cn/CN/abstract/abstract3863.shtml
  639. Tay, A. (2016). Primo and Summon – Same but different? – (I). Retrieved from http://musingsaboutlibrarianship.blogspot.be/2016/02/primo-and-summon-same-but-different-i.html
  640. Tay, A. (2015). 5 things Google Scholar does better than your library discovery service. Musings about librarianship. Retrieved August 4, 2015, from http://musingsaboutlibrarianship.blogspot.be/2015/07/5-things-google-scholar-does-better.html
  641. Tay, A. (2015). Measuring the value of contributed metadata in web scale discovery services. Retrieved from http://musingsaboutlibrarianship.blogspot.be/2015/12/measuring-value-of-contributed-metadata.html
  642. Tay, A. (2015). Of full text , thick metadata, and discovery search. Musings about librarianship. Retrieved from http://musingsaboutlibrarianship.blogspot.be/2015/10/of-full-text-thick-metadata-full-text.html
  643. Tay, A., & Yikang, F. (2015). Implementing a Bento-Style Search in LibGuides v2. Code4Lib Journal, (29). Retrieved from http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/10709
  644. Tay, A. (2014). Size of Google Scholar vs other indexes, personally tuned discovery layers & other discovery news. Musings about librarianship. Retrieved from http://musingsaboutlibrarianship.blogspot.be/2014/07/size-of-google-scholar-vs-other-indexes.html#.VKp8diuG_To
  645. Tay, A. (2014). Four possible Web Scale Discovery Future Scenarios. Musings about librarianship. Retrieved from http://musingsaboutlibrarianship.blogspot.be/2014/12/four-possible-web-scale-discovery.html#.VJQoDV4AOA
  646. Tay, A. (2013). How are discovery systems similar to Google? How are they different? Musings about librarianship. Retrieved from http://musingsaboutlibrarianship.blogspot.sg/2013/04/how-are-discovery-systems-similar-to.html
  647. Thoburn, J., Coates, A., & Stone, G. (2010). Simplifying resource discovery and access in academic libraries: implementing and evaluating Summon at Huddersfield and Northumbria Universities (p. 27). Newcastle. Retrieved from http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/9921
  648. Thoburn, J., Coates, A., & Stone, G. (2012). Simplifying Resource Discovery and Access in Academic Libraries: Implementing and Evaluating Summon at Huddersfield and Northumbria Universities. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 580–597). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch034
  649. Thomale, J., Hicks, W., & Phillips, M. (2016). The Bento Box Design Pattern. In K. Varnum (Ed.), Exploring Discovery: The Front Door to your Library’s Licensed and Digitized Content (pp. 117–139). Chicago, IL: ALA Editions.
  650. Thomas, B., & Buck, S. (2010). OCLC’s WorldCat Local versus III’s WebPAC: Which interface is better at supporting common user tasks? Library Hi Tech, 28(4), 648–671. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07378831011096295
  651. Thomas, J., Ekkel, T., & Mouw, J. (2008). AquaBrowser Innovations at the University of Chicago. The Charleston Advisor, 9(3), 56–58. Retrieved from http://charleston.publisher.ingentaconnect.com/content/charleston/chadv/2008/00000009/00000003/art00018
  652. Thomson, J. (2014). Implementing Web-Scale Discovery Services: A Practical Guide for Librarians (p. 174). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  653. Thompson, J. L., Obrig, K. S., & Abate, L. E. (2013). Web-Scale Discovery in an Academic Health Sciences Library: Development and Implementation of the EBSCO Discovery Service. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 32(1), 26–41. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2013.749111
  654. Thomsett-Scott, B., & Reese, P. E. (2012). Academic Libraries and Discovery Tools: A Survey of the Literature. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 19(2-4), 123–143. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2012.697009
  655. Thornton-Verma, H., Powers, A. C., Briceño-Rosales, Z. C., Fernandez, R., & Varnum, K. (2011). Discovering What Works: Librarians Compare Discovery Interface Experiences — Library Journal Reviews. Library Journal. Retrieved from http://reviews.libraryjournal.com/2011/12/reference/discovering-what-works-librarians-compare-discovery-interface-experiences/
  656. Thorpe, A., & Bowman, H. (2013). Promoting Discovery: Creating an In-Depth Library Marketing Campaign. Journal of Library Administration, 53(2-3), 100–121. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2013.853485
  657. Tianfang, D., & Airong, J. (2012). 窦天芳, 姜爱蓉. 资源发现系统功能分析及应用前景 [Function Analysis and Application Prospects of Resource Discovery System]. 图书情报工作 [Library and Information Service], 56(7), 38–43. Retrieved from http://159.226.100.150:8085/lis/CN/Y2012/V56/I7/38
  658. Timpson, H., & Sansom, G. (2011). A Student Perspective on e-Resource Discovery: Has the Google Factor Changed Publisher Platform Searching Forever? The Serials Librarian, 61(2), 253–266. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2011.592115
  659. Tyler Goldberg, Johnson, A. M., & Kuehn, R. (2012). Tiptoeing Forward: Implementing and Integrating WorldCat Local as a Discovery Tool. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 622–633). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch037
  660. Valentine, B., & West, B. (2016). Improving Primo Usability and Teachability with Help from the Users. Journal of Web Librarianship. http://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2016.1190678
  661. Van der Graaf, M. (2013). The ABES Discovery Study: A study into three scenarios for a National Webscale Discovery Tool for scholarly e-content (p. 31). Amsterdam. Retrieved from http://www.abes.fr/content/download/2688/11326/version/1/file/ABES+Discovery+Study+main+report.pdf
  662. Van Kampen-Breit, D. J., Asher, D., Henry, E., & Short, B. (2015). Using a shared leadership model to transition to a new ILS & discovery service: A case study. Library Leadership and Management, 30(2). Retrieved from https://journals.tdl.org/llm/index.php/llm/article/view/7145
  663. Varnum, K. (Ed.). (2016). Exploring Discovery: The Front Door to your Library’s Licensed and Digitized Content. Chicago, IL: ALA Editions.
  664. Varnum, K. (2014). Library Discovery: From Ponds to Oceans to Streams. In Discovery Tools Now and in the Future (18 November 2014). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/109407
  665. Varnum, K. (2014). Library Discovery: From Ponds to Streams. In K. J. Varnum (Ed.), The Top Technologies Every Librarian Needs to Know: A LITA Guide (pp. 57–65). Chicago, IL: ALA TechSource. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/107042
  666. Varnum, K. (2012). Discovery Here, Discovery There: The Pros and Cons of Local & Remote Hosting of Discovery Tools. In Conversation Starter at ALA Anaheim (June 23, 2012). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/91892
  667. Vaughan, J. (2011). Web Scale Discovery Services. Library Technology Reports, 47(1), 1–61. Retrieved from http://www.alatechsource.org/taxonomy/term/106/web-scale-discovery-services
  668. Vaughan, J. (2012). Evaluating and Selecting a Library Web-Scale Discovery Service. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 59–76). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch004
  669. Vaughan, J. (2012). Investigations into Library Web-Scale Discovery Services. Information Technology and Libraries, 31(1), 32–82. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v31i1.1916
  670. Wakeling, S., Clough, P., & Sen, B. (2014). Investigating the potential impact of non-personalized recommendations in the OPAC. In Proceedings of the 5th Information Interaction in Context Symposium on – IIiX ’14 (pp. 96–105). New York, New York, USA: ACM Press. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2637002.2637015
  671. Wakimoto, D. K. (2015). Undergraduates Have Difficulty Distinguishing Formats Based on Discovery Tool Search Results. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 10(2), 153–155. Retrieved from https://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/23930/18403
  672. Walker, J. (2015). The NISO Open Discovery Initiative: promoting transparency in discovery. Insights: The UKSG Journal, 28(1), 85–90. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1629/uksg.186
  673. Walker, S. (2012). Where the Rubber Meets the Road: Discovery Tools in the Information Literacy Classroom and at the Reference Desk. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/walkers01/where-the-rubber-meets-the-road-discovery-tools-in-the-information-literacy-classroom-and-at-the-reference-desk
  674. Walsh, G. (2015). Discovery at The National Archives. Refer: Journal of the ISG, 31(1), 26–29. Retrieved from https://referisg.wordpress.com/2015/03/01/discovery-at-the-national-archives/
  675. Walsh, G., & Childs, S. (2014). Discovering Discovery. CILIP Update, (May), 42–43.
  676. Wang, J., & Lim, A. (2009). Local touch and global reach: The next generation of network-level information discovery and delivery services in a digital landscape. Library Management, 30(1/2), 25–34. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01435120910927493
  677. Wang, Y., & Mi, J. (2012). Searchability and Discoverability of Library Resources: Federated Search and Beyond. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 19(2-4), 229–245. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2012.698944
  678. Watt, R. (2013). Data accessibility, performance and security for a hosted Primo. In IGeLU 2013 Conference Berlin. Retrieved from http://igelu.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/14-51-robertwattprimoigelufinaldraft03.9newhomepage.ppt
  679. Way, D. (2010). The Impact of Web-scale Discovery on the Use of a Library Collection. Serials Review, 36(4), 214–220. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2010.07.002
  680. Wead, A., & Thomas, J. (2016). Using Blacklight for Archival Discovery. In K. Varnum (Ed.), Exploring Discovery: The Front Door to your Library’s Licensed and Digitized Content (pp. 83–99). Chicago, IL: ALA Editions.
  681. Weare, William, J., Toms, S., & Breeding, M. (2011). Moving Forward: Next Gen Catalog and the new Discovery Tools. Library Media Connection, 30(3), 54–57.
  682. Weber, A. (2015). Einführung in die Welt der Discovery-Services. In 4. Schleswig-Holsteinischer Bibliothekartag, 14. Oktober 2015 in Kiel. Kiel. Retrieved from http://macau.uni-kiel.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/macau_derivate_00000265/VortragWeberSHBibtag2015.pdf
  683. Webster, P. (2012). The Web-Scale Discovery Environment and Changing Library Services and Processes. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 646–661). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch039
  684. Welch, A. J. (2012). Implementing Library Discovery: A Balancing Act. In M. P. Popp & D. Dallis (Eds.), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries (pp. 322–337). IGI Global/Information Science Reference. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch018
  685. Wells, D. (2016). Library discovery systems and their users: a case study from Curtin Unversity Library. Australian Academic & Research Libraries. http://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2016.1187249
  686. Westmancoat, H. (2011). Implementing OCLC WorldCat Local at York St John University. Mitteilungen Der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen & Bibliothekare, 64(2), 224–228. Retrieved from https://fedora.phaidra.univie.ac.at/fedora/get/o:103633/bdef:Content/get
  687. Wiesenmüller, H. (2012). Informationskompetenz und Bibliothekskataloge. In W. Sühl-Strohmenger (Ed.), Handbuch Informationskompetenz (pp. 93-100). De Gruyter Saur. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110255188.93
  688. Wieser, M., & Stern-Erlebach, G. (2011). Einsatz von Primo an der Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Tirol. Mitteilungen Der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen & Bibliothekare, 64(2), 189–191. Retrieved from https://fedora.phaidra.univie.ac.at/fedora/get/o:103633/bdef:Content/get
  689. Wilders, C. (2015). Thinking the Unthinkable: A Library Without a Public Catalog. In 2014 Charleston Library Conference. Purdue University. Purdue e-Pubs. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/charleston/2014/Users/6/
  690. Wiley, L. (2016). Report of the ALA ALCTS Publisher Vendor Library Relations Interest Group Meeting. American Library Association Annual Conference, San Francisco, June 2015. Technical Services Quarterly, 33(1), 80–87. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2015.1093843
  691. Williams, B. A. (2015). Face2Face=Traction. Refer: Journal of the ISG, 31(1), 12–14. Retrieved from https://referisg.wordpress.com/2015/03/01/face2face-traction/
  692. Williams, H., & Peters, A. (2012). And That’s How I Connect to MY Library: How a 42-second Promotional Video Helped to Launch the UTSA Libraries’ New Summon Mobile Application. The Reference Librarian, 53(3), 322–325. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02763877.2012.679845
  693. Williams, S. C., & Foster, A. K. (2011). Promise Fulfilled? An EBSCO Discovery Service Usability Study. Journal of Web Librarianship, 5(3), 179–198. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2011.597590
  694. Wisniewski, J. (2014). Beyond the Single Search Box: Discovery Systems. Online Searcher, 38(Mar/Apr), 74–76. Retrieved from http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/infotoday/doc/1515698512.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT:PAGE&type=current&date=Mar%2FApr+2014&author=Wisniewski%2C+Jeff&pub=Online+Searcher&edition=&startpage=74-76&desc=Beyond+the+Single+Search+Box%3A+Discovery+Systems
  695. Wisniewski, J. (2010). Web Scale Discovery: The Future’s So Bright, I Gotta Wear Shades. Online, 34(4), 55–57. Retrieved from http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/infotoday/doc/608920797.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT:PAGE&type=current&date=Jul/Aug%202010&author=Jeff%20Wisniewski&pub=Online&edition=&startpage=55&desc=Web%20Scale%20Discovery:%20The%20Future%27s%20So%20Bright,%20I%20Gotta%20Wear%20Shades
  696. Woods, R. F. (2010). From Federated Search to the Universal Search Solution. The Serials Librarian, 58(1-4), 141–148. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03615261003622957
  697. Wrosch, J., Rogers-Collins, K., Barnes, M., & Marino, W. (2012). Search Me: Eastern Michigan University’s Journey through the Highs and Lows of Implementing the Summon Discovery Tool. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 19(2-4), 367–386. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2012.693423
  698. Yang, S. Q. (2014). Charting Discovery System Improvements (2010-2013). Computers in Libraries, 34(8), 10–14.
  699. Yang, S. Q., & Hofmann, M. A. (2011). Next generation or current generation?: A study of the OPACs of 260 academic libraries in the USA and Canada. Library Hi Tech, 29(2), 266–300. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07378831111138170
  700. Yang, S. Q., & Wagner, K. (2010). Evaluating and comparing discovery tools: how close are we towards next generation catalog? Library Hi Tech, 28(4), 690–709. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07378831011096312
  701. Yeo Pin Pin. (2012). Impact of a new discovery service at Li Ka Shing Library. Singapore Journal of Library & Information Management, 41, 36–50. Retrieved from http://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/library_research/19/
  702. Yesmin, S., & Ahmed, S. M. Z. (2016). Preference of Bangladesh university students for searching the library catalogue. The Electronic Library, 34(4), 683–695. http://doi.org/10.1108/EL-07-2015-0139
  703. Yuvaraj, M., Cmor, D., Li, X., & Hoeppner, A. (2016). Impact of Discovery Layers on Accessing E-Resources in Academic Libraries: In E. de Smet & S. Dhamdhere (Eds.), E-Discovery Tools and Applications in Modern Libraries (pp. 181–200). IGI Global. http://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0474-0.ch010
  704. Zhang, T. (2013). Design, User Experience, and Usability. Web, Mobile, and Product Design. (A. Marcus, Ed.)Design, User Experience, and Usability. Web, Mobile, and Product Design (Vol. 8015). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39253-5
  705. Zhu, J., & Kelley, J. (2015). Collaborating to Reduce Content Gaps in Discovery: What Publishers, Discovery Service Providers, and Libraries Can Do to Close the Gaps. Science & Technology Libraries, 1–14. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2015.1102677
  706. Zylstra, R. (2011). A Mobile Application for Discovery. Computers in Libraries, 31(2). Retrieved from http://www.infotoday.com/cilmag/mar11/Zylstra.shtml
  707. 馬淵沙織, & 長谷川智史. (2016). 情報の電子化・図書館ネットワーク : ディスカバリーサービスの検索履歴から見るユーザー動向[Digitization/Library Network: View of Usage Trends across Discovery Service]. Journal of the Japan Medical Library Association / Igaku Toshokan, 63(1), 12–16.
Advertisements